Literature DB >> 16170051

Screening for dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors using MOLPRINT 2D, a fast fragment-based method employing the naïve Bayesian classifier: limitations of the descriptor and the importance of balanced chemistry in training and test sets.

Andreas Bender1, Hamse Y Mussa, Robert C Glen.   

Abstract

A fragment-based similarity searching method, MOLPRINT 2D, was employed for virtual screening of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. Using the original training set of 50,000 compounds, only marginal enrichment factors (between 1 and 3) could be achieved on the test library. The active structures contained in the training and test libraries represented different types of "chemistry", that is, different substructural features associated with activity. Training and test sets were pooled in a 2nd step and randomly split into training and test of equal size, with the objective of smoothing out the different chemical characteristics of both libraries. In a 10-fold cross-validation study on the new training and test sets, typically 10-fold enrichment could be found in the first 96 positions, 4-fold enrichment in the first 384 positions, and 3-fold enrichment in the first 1536 positions, corresponding to 6, 10, and 28 hits, respectively (out of a total of 307; activity defined as average residual activity of less than 80%). The conclusions are 2-fold. On one hand, the exact fragment-matching similarity searching method employed here is not capable of finding completely novel hit structures. On the other hand, this study emphasizes the requirement for a comparable distribution of chemical features of the training and test sets. MOLPRINT 2D is freely downloadable from http://www.cheminformatics.org.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16170051     DOI: 10.1177/1087057105281048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  7 in total

1.  Estimating the domain of applicability for machine learning QSAR models: a study on aqueous solubility of drug discovery molecules.

Authors:  Timon Sebastian Schroeter; Anton Schwaighofer; Sebastian Mika; Antonius Ter Laak; Detlev Suelzle; Ursula Ganzer; Nikolaus Heinrich; Klaus-Robert Müller
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Estimating the domain of applicability for machine learning QSAR models: a study on aqueous solubility of drug discovery molecules.

Authors:  Timon Sebastian Schroeter; Anton Schwaighofer; Sebastian Mika; Antonius Ter Laak; Detlev Suelzle; Ursula Ganzer; Nikolaus Heinrich; Klaus-Robert Müller
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  jCompoundMapper: An open source Java library and command-line tool for chemical fingerprints.

Authors:  Georg Hinselmann; Lars Rosenbaum; Andreas Jahn; Nikolas Fechner; Andreas Zell
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  Bayesian models trained with HTS data for predicting β-haematin inhibition and in vitro antimalarial activity.

Authors:  Kathryn J Wicht; Jill M Combrinck; Peter J Smith; Timothy J Egan
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence and machine-learning approaches in structure and ligand-based discovery of drugs affecting central nervous system.

Authors:  Vertika Gautam; Anand Gaurav; Neeraj Masand; Vannajan Sanghiran Lee; Vaishali M Patil
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.364

6.  Influence relevance voting: an accurate and interpretable virtual high throughput screening method.

Authors:  S Joshua Swamidass; Chloé-Agathe Azencott; Ting-Wan Lin; Hugo Gramajo; Shiou-Chuan Tsai; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 7.  Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations.

Authors:  Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.851

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.