Literature DB >> 16169674

Prognostic value of tumor regression evaluated after first course of radiotherapy for anal canal cancer.

Olivier Chapet1, Jean-Pierre Gerard, Benjamin Riche, Annunziato Alessio, Francoise Mornex, Pascale Romestaing.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the tumor response after an initial course of irradiation predicts for colostomy-free survival and overall survival in patients with anal canal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1980 and 1998, 252 patients were treated by pelvic external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy boost in 218 or EBRT in 34. EBRT was combined with chemotherapy in 168 patients. An evaluation of tumor regression, before the boost, was available for 221 patients. They were divided into four groups according to the tumor response: <70%, 70-80%, >80% but <100%, and 100%.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 58 months. The overall survival rate was 72.6% +/- 3.1% and 57.3% +/- 4.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The disease-free survival rate was 60.0% +/- 3.3% and 49.4% +/- 3.9% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The colostomy-free survival rate was 61% at 5 years and 47% at 10 years. Two groups could be differentiated according to the percentage of tumor regression before the boost: >80% vs. < or = 80%. The group with a T3-T4 lesion and tumor regression < or = 80% had the poorest overall (52.8% +/- 12.3%), disease-free (19.9% +/- 9.9%), and colostomy-free survival (24.8% +/- 11.2%) rates.
CONCLUSION: The amount of tumor regression before EBRT or brachytherapy boost is a strong prognostic factor of disease control without colostomy. When regression is < or = 80% in patients with an initial T3-T4 lesion, the use of conservative RT should be carefully evaluated because of the very poor disease-free and colostomy-free survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16169674     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

1.  Role of brachytherapy in the treatment of cancers of the anal canal. Long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of a large monocentric retrospective series.

Authors:  Laëtitia Lestrade; Berardino De Bari; Pascal Pommier; Xavier Montbarbon; Emilie Lavergne; Jean-Michel Ardiet; Christian Carrie
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  The role of MRI in the assessment of the local status of anal carcinomas and in their management.

Authors:  É Jederán; J Lővey; Z Szentirmai; E Hitre; G Léránt; K Horváth; M Gődény
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  A Modified Classification of Prognostic Factors Based on Pathological Stage and Tumor Regression Grade in Patients with Rectal Cancer Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Suzuki; Sotaro Sadahiro; Akira Tanaka; Kazutake Okada; Gota Saito; Hiroshi Miyakita; Takeshi Akiba; Hiroshi Yamamuro
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.935

4.  Radiochemotherapy and brachytherapy could be the standard treatment for anal canal cancer in elderly patients? A retrospective single-centre analysis.

Authors:  Laetitia Lestrade; Berardino De Bari; Xavier Montbarbon; Pascal Pommier; Christian Carrie
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Impact of early tumor reduction on outcome differs by histological subtype in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Kanzaki; Masaaki Kataoka; Atsushi Nishikawa; Kotaro Uwatsu; Kei Nagasaki; Noriko Nishijima; Takashi Ochi; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Prognostic factors for squamous cell cancer of the anal canal.

Authors:  Prajnan Das; Christopher H Crane; Cathy Eng; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01

7.  FDG-PET metabolic response predicts outcomes in anal cancer managed with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  F L Day; E Link; S Ngan; T Leong; K Moodie; C Lynch; M Michael; E de Winton; A Hogg; R J Hicks; A Heriot
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients' health quality perception.

Authors:  Rémi Bourdais; Samir Achkar; Sophie Espenel; Sophie Bockel; Laetitia Chauffert-Yvart; Florence Ravet de Mellis; Minh-Hanh Ta; Wassila Boukhelif; Jérôme Durand-Labrunie; Pascal Burtin; Christine Haie-Meder; Eric Deutsch; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Long term outcome after combined modality treatment for anal cancer.

Authors:  Irena Oblak; Primoz Petric; Franc Anderluh; Vaneja Velenik; Peter Albert Fras
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 10.  Management of persistent anal canal carcinoma after combined-modality therapy: a clinical review.

Authors:  Daniela Musio; Francesca De Felice; Nicola Raffetto; Vincenzo Tombolini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.