Literature DB >> 16169512

Biomechanical evaluation of four different mattresses.

James W DeVocht1, David G Wilder2, Eric R Bandstra2, Kevin F Spratt3.   

Abstract

This study provided an objective, biomechanical comparison of four "top of the line" mattresses from four different manufacturers using two different measurements. One, which has been used in other studies, was pressure distribution patterns-evaluating maximum pressures generated by an individual lying supine on the mattresses. The other was a novel approach developed specifically for this study-quantifying the degree of spinal distortion induced when in the side posture position. Eighteen normal adult males of similar height but in three different weight groups were tested using both of these approaches on each of four mattresses. As expected, greater maximum pressure directly related to subject's weight group and was greater in the pelvic compared to the thoracic region. One mattress did induce significantly lower maximum pressures than the other three in both the pelvic and thoracic regions. Spinal distortion was not reliably different across the four mattresses in five of the seven spine regions evaluated. However, at the T1/T3 and the T6/T8 spinal segments, inconsistent but statistically significant separation between some mattresses was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16169512     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.940


  8 in total

1.  Effects of Mattress Material on Body Pressure Profiles in Different Sleeping Postures.

Authors:  Fan-Zhe Low; Matthew Chin-Heng Chua; Pan-Yin Lim; Chen-Hua Yeow
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-21

2.  Your Pillow May Not Guarantee a Good Night's Sleep or Symptom-Free Waking.

Authors:  Susan J Gordon; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging zygapophyseal joint space changes (gapping) in low back pain patients following spinal manipulation and side-posture positioning: a randomized controlled mechanisms trial with blinding.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Jerrilyn Cambron; Joe A Cantu; Jennifer M Dexheimer; Judith D Pocius; Douglas Gregerson; Michael Fergus; Ray McKinnis; Thomas J Grieve
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Spine alignment in men during lateral sleep position: experimental study and modeling.

Authors:  Karim Leilnahari; Nasser Fatouraee; Mahmoud Khodalotfi; Mohammad Amin Sadeghein; Yekta Amin Kashani
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Effects of interface pressure distribution on human sleep quality.

Authors:  Zongyong Chen; Yuqian Li; Rong Liu; Dong Gao; Quanhui Chen; Zhian Hu; Jiajun Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Relationship between Sleeping Position and Sleep Quality: A Flexible Sensor-Based Study.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Aiping Xiao; Tianhao Zheng; Huafei Xiao; Ruiyan Huang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Sleeping mattress determinants and evaluation: a biomechanical review and critique.

Authors:  Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Yan Wang; Jin Lin; Qitao Tan; Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Ming Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  What type of mattress should be chosen to avoid back pain and improve sleep quality? Review of the literature.

Authors:  Gianfilippo Caggiari; Giuseppe Rocco Talesa; Giuseppe Toro; Eugenio Jannelli; Gaetano Monteleone; Leonardo Puddu
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-12-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.