Literature DB >> 16169147

Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.

Thomas Edward Gladwin1, Job Pieter Lindsen, Ritske de Jong.   

Abstract

The task-switching paradigm provides an opportunity to study whether oscillatory relations in neuronal activity are involved in switching between and maintaining task sets. The EEG of subjects performing an alternating runs [Rogers, R.D., Monsell, S., 1995. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124, 207-231] task-switching task was analyzed using event-related potentials, the lateralized readiness potential, instantaneous amplitude and the phase-locking value [Lachaux, J.P., Rodriguez, E., Martinirie, J., Varela, F.J., 1999. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping 8, 194-208]. The two tasks differed in the relevant modality (visual versus auditory) and the hand with which responses were to be given. The mixture model [de Jong, R., 2000. An intention driven account of residual switch costs. In: Monsell, S., Driver, J. (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Control. MIT Press, Cambridge] was used to assign pre-stimulus switch probabilities to switch trials based on reaction time; these probabilities were used to create a fast-slow distinction between trials on both switch and hold trials. Results showed both time- and time-frequency-domain effects, during the intervals preceding stimuli, of switching versus maintenance, response speed of the upcoming stimulus, and response hand. Of potential importance for task-switching theory were interactions between reaction time by switch-hold trial type that were found for a frontal slow negative potential and the lateralized readiness potential during the response-stimulus interval, indicating that effective preparation for switch trials involves different anticipatory activity than for hold trials. Theta-band oscillatory activity during the pre-stimulus period was found to be higher when subsequent reaction times were shorter, but this response speed effect did not interact with trial type. The response hand of the upcoming task was associated with lateralization of pre-stimulus mu- and beta-band amplitude and, specifically for switch trials, beta-band phase locking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16169147     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  16 in total

1.  When the brain changes its mind: flexibility of action selection in instructed and free choices.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Rogier B Mars; Thomas E Gladwin; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Human EEG uncovers latent generalizable rule structure during learning.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; James F Cavanagh; Michael J Frank
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Neural correlates of task and source switching: similar or different?

Authors:  Iroise Dumontheil; Sam J Gilbert; Paul W Burgess; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Dissociable neural correlates of intention and action preparation in voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Edita Poljac; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neural predictors of moment-to-moment fluctuations in cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Andrew B Leber; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Movement planning and reprogramming in individuals with autism.

Authors:  Natasha Nazarali; Cheryl M Glazebrook; Digby Elliott
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2009-05-23

8.  It's about Time.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Do resting brain dynamics predict oddball evoked-potential?

Authors:  Tien-Wen Lee; Younger W-Y Yu; Hung-Chi Wu; Tai-Jui Chen
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Reconciling the influence of task-set switching and motor inhibition processes on stop signal after-effects.

Authors:  Joaquin A Anguera; Kyle Lyman; Theodore P Zanto; Jacob Bollinger; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.