Peck-Sun Lin1, Andrew Wu. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 College Street, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. plin@vcu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test whether or not the commonly prescribed daily dose of 2 Gy (whole fraction), when delivered as various partial fraction (PF) dose sequences simulating clinical treatment fields, produces equal biologic effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven actively proliferating cell lines derived from human and animal tissues were used in this study. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and clonogenic assays were used to determine the radiation effects on cell proliferation and survival, respectively. The 2 Gy dose was divided into 2 or more PFs for delivery to simulate the delivery of clinical treatment fields. Most irradiation sequences contained two parts consisting of at least 1 small PF, denoted by S which was 0.5 Gy or less, and a large PF, denoted by L which was 1 Gy or more. Irradiation schemes were designed to include the following conditions: (a) the 2 Gy dose divided into combinations of an L-dose and one or more S-doses; (b) the L-dose given either before or after the S-doses; and (c) delivery of all partial fractions within a fixed total time. RESULTS: Significant differences in biologic effect were observed between sequences in which the L-dose was given before or after the S-doses in both the MTT and clonogenic assays. Nearly all the latter schemes, that is S-L, produced greater cytotoxic effects than the L-S schemes. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the biologic effects of 2 Gy may differ in different clinical settings depending on the size and sequence of the partial fractions. The variation between cytotoxic effects is likely a result of the combination of low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) and higher-dose increased radioresistance (IRR) effects established recently. We suggest that to ensure the optimal biologic effect of a prescribed dose of 2 Gy clinically, it is critical to consider the sequence in which the treatment fields are delivered when partial fractions of different sizes are used.
PURPOSE: To test whether or not the commonly prescribed daily dose of 2 Gy (whole fraction), when delivered as various partial fraction (PF) dose sequences simulating clinical treatment fields, produces equal biologic effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven actively proliferating cell lines derived from human and animal tissues were used in this study. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and clonogenic assays were used to determine the radiation effects on cell proliferation and survival, respectively. The 2 Gy dose was divided into 2 or more PFs for delivery to simulate the delivery of clinical treatment fields. Most irradiation sequences contained two parts consisting of at least 1 small PF, denoted by S which was 0.5 Gy or less, and a large PF, denoted by L which was 1 Gy or more. Irradiation schemes were designed to include the following conditions: (a) the 2 Gy dose divided into combinations of an L-dose and one or more S-doses; (b) the L-dose given either before or after the S-doses; and (c) delivery of all partial fractions within a fixed total time. RESULTS: Significant differences in biologic effect were observed between sequences in which the L-dose was given before or after the S-doses in both the MTT and clonogenic assays. Nearly all the latter schemes, that is S-L, produced greater cytotoxic effects than the L-S schemes. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the biologic effects of 2 Gy may differ in different clinical settings depending on the size and sequence of the partial fractions. The variation between cytotoxic effects is likely a result of the combination of low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) and higher-dose increased radioresistance (IRR) effects established recently. We suggest that to ensure the optimal biologic effect of a prescribed dose of 2 Gy clinically, it is critical to consider the sequence in which the treatment fields are delivered when partial fractions of different sizes are used.
Authors: Joshua E Meyer; Niklas K Finnberg; Lili Chen; Dusica Cvetkovic; Bin Wang; Lanlan Zhou; Yanqun Dong; Mark A Hallman; Chang-Ming C Ma; Wafik S El-Deiry Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Peter L Kench; Linda Rogers; Ana Esteves; Tina Gorjiara; Elizabeth Claridge Mackonis; Stephen Morrell; David R McKenzie; Natalka Suchowerska Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-11-28