Literature DB >> 16168342

Scaled rectangle diagrams can be used to visualize clinical and epidemiological data.

Roger J Marshall1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate scaled rectangle diagrams as a method for displaying clinical and epidemiological attributes (such as symptoms, signs, results of marker tests, disease, or risk factors). These are quantitative Venn diagrams, but using rectangles instead of circles. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: The method is illustrated through examples from various data sets with different types of clinical information.
RESULTS: Examples drawing on studies of lung disease, rheumatic fever, blood pressure, lipid levels, sudden infant death syndrome, and low birth weight illustrate the different types of relationships between variables that the scaled rectangle approach can reveal (e.g., high- and low-risk groups; dependent, independent, or co-occurring attributes; effects from choice of cutoff; cumulative distributions; and case-control attributes).
CONCLUSION: Scaled rectangle diagrams are a novel way to display clinical data. They show clearly the relative frequency of clinical attributes and the extent to which they are shared characteristics. Features are revealed that might otherwise not have been appreciated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16168342     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  7 in total

1.  Individual and joint expert judgments as reference standards in artifact detection.

Authors:  Marion Verduijn; Niels Peek; Nicolette F de Keizer; Erik-Jan van Lieshout; Anne-Cornelie J M de Pont; Marcus J Schultz; Evert de Jonge; Bas A J M de Mol
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Comparison of discriminatory power and accuracy of three lung cancer risk models.

Authors:  A M D'Amelio; A Cassidy; K Asomaning; O Y Raji; S W Duffy; J K Field; M R Spitz; D Christiani; C J Etzel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Proportional classifications of COPD phenotypes.

Authors:  S E Marsh; J Travers; M Weatherall; M V Williams; S Aldington; P M Shirtcliffe; A L Hansell; M R Nowitz; A A McNaughton; J B Soriano; R W Beasley
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Predictive factors for entry to long-term residential care in octogenarian Māori and non-Māori in New Zealand, LiLACS NZ cohort.

Authors:  Marycarol Holdaway; Janine Wiles; Ngaire Kerse; Zhenqiang Wu; Simon Moyes; Martin J Connolly; Oliver Menzies; Ruth Teh; Marama Muru-Lanning; Merryn Gott; Joanna B Broad
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Knowledge translation of prediction rules: methods to help health professionals understand their trade-offs.

Authors:  K Hemming; M Taljaard
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2021-12-13

6.  Management in non-traumatic arm, neck and shoulder complaints: differences between diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Anita Feleus; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Harald S Miedema; Jan A N Verhaar; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  eulerAPE: drawing area-proportional 3-Venn diagrams using ellipses.

Authors:  Luana Micallef; Peter Rodgers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.