Literature DB >> 16167773

Stereoscopic correspondence for ambiguous targets is affected by elevation and fixation distance.

Paul B Hibbard1, Samira Bouzit.   

Abstract

Binocular correspondence must be determined if disparity is to be used to provide information about three-dimensional shape. The current study investigated whether knowledge of the statistical distribution of disparities in the natural environment is employed in this process. A simple model, which produces distributions of distances similar to those found in the natural environment, was used to predict the distribution of disparities in natural images. This model predicts that crossed disparities will be more likely as (i) stimulus elevation decreases below fixation and (ii) fixation distance increases. To determine whether these factors influence binocular correspondence for human observers, ambiguous stereograms were presented to observers, as stimulus elevation and fixation distance were manipulated. Clear biases were observed in the depth perceived in these stereograms, which were more likely to be seen as closer than fixation (i) for stimuli presented below fixation and (ii) as fixation distance increased. These results suggest that binocular correspondence is determined in a manner consistent with the distributions of disparities expected in natural scenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16167773     DOI: 10.1163/1568568054389589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  11 in total

1.  Emergence of Binocular Disparity Selectivity through Hebbian Learning.

Authors:  Tushar Chauhan; Timothée Masquelier; Alexandre Montlibert; Benoit R Cottereau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper; Johannes Burge; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.

Authors:  Arvind V Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment.

Authors:  William W Sprague; Emily A Cooper; Ivana Tošić; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  The natural statistics of blur.

Authors:  William W Sprague; Emily A Cooper; Sylvain Reissier; Baladitya Yellapragada; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The Active Side of Stereopsis: Fixation Strategy and Adaptation to Natural Environments.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Andrea Canessa; Silvio P Sabatini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Asymmetries in visual acuity around the visual field.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Shutian Xue; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-11

9.  Mechanisms for similarity matching in disparity measurement.

Authors:  Ross Goutcher; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-08

10.  Natural statistics of depth edges modulate perceptual stability.

Authors:  Zeynep Basgöze; David N White; Johannes Burge; Emily A Cooper
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.