Literature DB >> 16167522

Clinical use and tolerability of voriconazole in the treatment of fungal infections in critically ill patients.

F Alvarez-Lerma1, J M Nicolás-Arfelis, J C Rodríguez-Borregán, J Díaz-Regañón, M Sa-Borges, F García-López, A Allepuz-Palau.   

Abstract

The clinical use and tolerability of voriconazole in daily practice for the treatment of fungal infection in critically ill patients was assessed in an open-label, non-comparative, observational study. All patients admitted to medical-surgical Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of 21 hospitals in Spain between February 2003 and January 2004, who were treated with voriconazole because of known or suspected fungal infection, were included. A total of 130 patients received voriconazole (6.2 cases per ICU). Fungal infections were classified as proven in 50 patients (38.5%) and probable in 38 (29.2%). The etiology was established in 103 patients, with Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus as the most common pathogens. In 98 (75.4%) patients, voriconazole was initially administered intravenously. Fifty-three patients (40.8%) were treated with other antifungal agents prior to the use of voriconazole. In 21 patients (16.2%), voriconazole was administered in combination with other antifungal drugs. Clinical responses were cure and improvement in 65 (50%) patients, failure in 26 (20%), and undetermined in 39 (30%). The crude ICU mortality was 49.2%. According to multivariate analysis, ICU mortality was significantly associated with pneumonia (OR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.07-10.18) and infection caused by Aspergillus spp. (OR = 3.70, 95% Cl 1.12-12.28), whereas eradication of the causative microorganisms was inversely associated (OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.05-0.34). Adverse events were recorded in 65 patients, probably or possibly related to the study drug in 21. In conclusion, in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU, the use of voriconazole was affective in 50% of cases. The drug was well tolerated and discontinuation of voriconazole treatment due to adverse events was not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16167522     DOI: 10.1179/joc.2005.17.4.417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chemother        ISSN: 1120-009X            Impact factor:   1.714


  6 in total

Review 1.  Voriconazole : a review of its use in the management of invasive fungal infections.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Dene Simpson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerance of voriconazole in renally impaired subjects: two prospective, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group volunteer studies.

Authors:  Samantha Abel; Richard Allan; Kuan Gandelman; Konrad Tomaszewski; David J Webb; Nolan D Wood
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections among high-risk neutropenic patients in Spain.

Authors:  Santiago Grau; Rafael de la Cámara; Francisco J Sabater; Isidro Jarque; Enric Carreras; Miguel A Casado; Miguel A Sanz
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  An observational efficacy and safety analysis of the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis using voriconazole.

Authors:  F Jacobs; D Selleslag; M Aoun; A Sonet; A Gadisseur
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Voriconazole in the management of nosocomial invasive fungal infections.

Authors:  Javier Pemán; Miguel Salavert; Emilia Cantón; Isidro Jarque; Eva Romá; Rafael Zaragoza; Angel Viudes; Miguel Gobernado
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Update on the treatment of disseminated fusariosis: Focus on voriconazole.

Authors:  Marta Stanzani; Fabio Tumietto; Nicola Vianelli; Michele Baccarani
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.