Literature DB >> 16167223

Cerebral monitoring in the operating room and the intensive care unit - an introductory for the clinician and a guide for the novice wanting to open a window to the brain. Part II: Sensory-evoked potentials (SSEP, AEP, VEP).

Enno Freye1.   

Abstract

An evoked potential differs from the EEG mainly in two ways: 1. The EEG is a random, continuous signal, which arises from the ongoing activity of the outer layers of the cortex. An evoked potential is the brain's response to a repetitive stimulus along a specific nerve pathway. 2.EEG signals range from 10-200 milliVolt (mV). Evoked potentials are smaller in amplitude (1-5-20 microVolt requiring precise electrode positioning and special techniques (signal averaging) to extract the specific response from the underlying EEG "noise". The technique of signal averaging, as originally described by Dawson in 1954 [69J, has been further developed in computer processing. The technique is now used by applying a stimulus repeatedly--preferably at randomized intervals--and to record the evoked response over the corresponding area of the brain, averaging out mathematically the change over the number of stimuli. Rationale for the use of EPs in the OR and the ICU. Evoked potentials (EPs) serve the following major purposes: 1. Monitoring of the functional integrity of neural structures that may be at risk during, for instance, ECC (extracorporeal circulation) or endarterectomy indicating cerebral hypoxia. 2. Monitoring of the effects of anesthetic agents and other centrally active drugs, which, besides the cortex, affect deeper neuronal structures. 3. Orthopedic cases where the spinal cord is at risk such as Harrington rod insertion and removal. 4. Clamping of the abdominal aortic artery during aneurysmectomy resulting in a potential damage of the lower parts of the spinal cord. 5. Clipping of an intracerebral aneurysm, which may be impeding blood flow to vital cerebral textures. 6. An indicator of cerebral hypoxia when the blood pressure is deliberately lowered. 7. Operation on peripheral nerves and nerve roots to identify early trauma. 8. Monitoring the cerebral function during controlled hypothermia when the EEG becomes flat. 9. Monitoring of the pathophysiological conditions after severe head trauma and the effects of therapy. 10. An intraoperative warning device of unsuspected awareness during light anesthesia when movement is abolished by muscle relaxants and cardiovascular responses are modified by vasoactive drugs. In case of the latter the stimulus is a small electrical potential applied to the skin of the hand. Thereafter, the stimulus travels along the specific nervous pathways inducing (= generating) potential activation at various sites. The generation of potential changes at various sites along the pathway is an index for the integrity of the nerve. Thus, the evoked potential can be considered a neurophysiological response (usually of the cortex) to impulses originating from some externally stimulated sensory nerve. They provide a physiological measure of the functional integrity of the sensory nerve pathway, which can be used as a clinical diagnostic tool as well as for intraoperative monitoring. The evoked potential usually is recorded from the specific cortical area corresponding to the stimulus input. The classification of evoked potentials. Stimulating a sensory nervous pathway induces evoked potentials. If the auditory nerve is stimulated by "clicks" from headphones, it is called the auditory evoked potential (AEP). The early part of the AEP waveform (less than 10 msec) is called the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential (BAEP) since it reflects the passing of the impulse through the brainstem. If a nerve on the arm or the leg is stimulated by a small electrical current applied to the overlying skin, it is called the Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP). If, however, the retina is stimulated by means of flicker light or a sudden change in a checkerboard pattern, the evoked potential thus recorded over the corresponding cortical area is called the Visual Evoked Potential (VEP). Evoked potentials are used both as a diagnostic tool and as a monitoring technique. As diagnostic tests, evoked potentials are useful to evaluate neurologic disorders such as: a) multiple sclerosis, b) acoustic nerve tumors, and c) optic neuritis. As a monitoring modality, evoked potentials are used during all surgical procedures, which might compromise part of the brain or the spinal cord.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16167223     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-005-0713-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  24 in total

1.  On-line analysis of middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) for monitoring depth of anaesthesia in laboratory rats.

Authors:  E W Jensen; M Nygaard; S W Henneberg
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) are affected differently by mu- and kappa-selective opioids in the dog.

Authors:  E Freye; R Buhl; G K Schenk
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  1987 Jul-Sep

3.  Cutaneous and muscle afferent components of the cerebral potential evoked by electrical stimulation of human peripheral nerves.

Authors:  D Burke; N F Skuse; A K Lethlean
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-06

4.  Modulation of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials by general anesthesia.

Authors:  E Kochs; R D Treede; J Schulte am Esch; B Bromm
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Somatosensory evoked potentials following stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in man.

Authors:  M Stöhr; F Petruch
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1979-03-22       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials during neurosurgical operations: methods and applications.

Authors:  B L Grundy
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Somatosensory-evoked potentials during block of surgical stimulation with propofol.

Authors:  E Freye; E Hartung; G K Schenk
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Brainstem auditory and short-latency somatosensory evoked responses in brain death.

Authors:  W D Goldie; K H Chiappa; R R Young; E B Brooks
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in posterior circulation surgery.

Authors:  J R Little; R P Lesser; H Lueders; A J Furlan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Spinal and cortical evoked potentials following stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve in the diagnosis and localization of spinal cord diseases.

Authors:  B Riffel; M Stöhr; S Körner
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  The changes of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) after vertebrobasilar artery ischemia in rabbits.

Authors:  Zeng-Lin Cai; Zheng-Chun Zhang; Jian-Qiang Ni; Shou-Ru Xue; Li-Zhen Xu; Fang-Ping Wu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  Neurophysiological assessment of brain dysfunction in critically ill patients: an update.

Authors:  Eric Azabou; Catherine Fischer; Jean Michel Guerit; Djillali Annane; François Mauguiere; Fréderic Lofaso; Tarek Sharshar
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Signal persistence of bispectral index and state entropy during surgical procedure under sedation.

Authors:  Chanannait Paisansathan; Mukadder D Ozcan; Qaiser S Khan; Verna L Baughman; Mehmet S Ozcan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-02-02

4.  A new measure for monitoring intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Jin; Chun Kee Chung; Jeong Eun Kim; Young Doo Choi
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-12-31

5.  Anesthesia and evoked responses in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Suren Soghomonyan; Kenneth R Moran; Gurneet S Sandhu; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Somatosensory and transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in a porcine model for experimental procedures.

Authors:  Sven Maier; Ulrich Goebel; Sonja Krause; Christoph Benk; Martin A Schick; Hartmut Buerkle; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Fabian A Kari; Jakob Wollborn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.