Literature DB >> 16166778

Mode of collection does not influence haematopoietic content of umbilical cord blood units from caesarean deliveries.

Pilar Solves1, Manuel Fillol, Mara López, Alfredo Perales, Fernando Bonilla-Musoles, Vicente Mirabet, M Angeles Soler, Roberto J Roig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Collection strategy is the first step for collecting good quality cord blood units. There are two main different techniques for collecting cord blood from the umbilical vein: in the delivery room while the placenta is still in the utero by midwifes and obstetricians, or in an adjacent room after placental delivery by cord blood bank trained personal. Our aim was to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages between the two different cord blood collection strategies in caesarean deliveries.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of cord blood units collected from caesarean deliveries for a 3-year period. Caesarean section was performed with a low uterine transversal incision in all patients according to common obstetrical practice. Cord blood collection was performed before or after placental delivery.
RESULTS: Obstetrical and umbilical cord blood data was obtained from 253 caesarean deliveries. No statistically significant difference was observed for obstetrical variables or cord blood variables except for Hct and platelets.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude both methods produce comparable TNC, CD34 and CFU counts of cord blood units collected from caesarean sections. Before placental delivery collection avoids the financial investment that generates the presence of cord blood banking personal in the maternity ward. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16166778     DOI: 10.1159/000088340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  3 in total

1.  Four phases of checks for exclusion of umbilical cord blood donors.

Authors:  Gennaro Volpe; Michele Santodirocco; Lazzaro Di Mauro; Giuseppe Miscio; Filippo Maria Boscia; Brunella Muto; Nicola Volpe
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Contamination Rate of Cryopreserved Umbilical Cord Blood Is Inversely Correlated with Volume of Sample Collected and Is also Dependent on Delivery Mode.

Authors:  Susanne Reuther; Kathrin Floegel; Gunther Ceusters; Veronica Albertini; Jakub Baran; Wolfram Dempke
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 7.655

Review 3.  Umbilical cord blood quality and quantity: Collection up to transplantation.

Authors:  Seyed Hadi Mousavi; Morteza Zarrabi; Saeid Abroun; Mona Ahmadipanah; Bahareh Abbaspanah
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2019-12-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.