Literature DB >> 16166363

Population health. More than the sum of the parts?

Daniel D Reidpath1.   

Abstract

The past decade has seen an upsurge of interest in the development of summary measures of population health. Almost invariably the measures have relied on "rolling up" individual level health data such as mortality data or life expectancy data. The approach, however, of treating population health as a synthesis of aggregated individual level data is a historical and statistical convenience. Although there has been some debate in the literature about whether one should also examine the equity of the distribution of health, the general practice has been to treat the level of a population's health and the distribution of health within a population as separate issues. Without recourse to contentious notions of equity, this paper examines the possibility of treating populations as more than simply the sum of their parts by combining individual level health data with population level data about the distribution of health. This approach may provide policy makers with additional ways of thinking about what it means to improve a population's health.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16166363      PMCID: PMC1732914          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.036046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  5 in total

Review 1.  Defining and measuring health inequality: an approach based on the distribution of health expectancy.

Authors:  E E Gakidou; C J Murray; J Frenk
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  A critical examination of summary measures of population health.

Authors:  C J Murray; J A Salomon; C Mathers
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Measuring the health of populations: the veil of ignorance approach.

Authors:  José-Luis Pinto-Prades; José-María Abellán-Perpiñán
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Infant mortality rate as an indicator of population health.

Authors:  D D Reidpath; P Allotey
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert; J Kievit; J W Leer; G Stoter; J C de Haes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  The fallacy of the equity-efficiency trade off: rethinking the efficient health system.

Authors:  Daniel D Reidpath; Anna Elisabet Olafsdottir; Subhash Pokhrel; Pascale Allotey
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  The Millennium Development Goals fail poor children: the case for equity-adjusted measures.

Authors:  Daniel D Reidpath; Chantal M Morel; Jeffrey W Mecaskey; Pascale Allotey
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 11.069

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.