Literature DB >> 16166329

Decreased androgen receptor levels and receptor function in breast cancer contribute to the failure of response to medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Grant Buchanan1, Stephen N Birrell, Amelia A Peters, Tina Bianco-Miotto, Katrina Ramsay, Elisa J Cops, Miao Yang, Jonathan M Harris, Henry A Simila, Nicole L Moore, Jacqueline M Bentel, Carmella Ricciardelli, David J Horsfall, Lisa M Butler, Wayne D Tilley.   

Abstract

Previously, we reported that androgen receptor (AR), but not estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR), is predictive of response to the synthetic progestin, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), in a cohort of 83 patients with metastatic breast cancer. To further investigate the role of AR in determining response to MPA in this cohort, we analyzed AR levels by immunohistochemistry with two discrete antisera directed at either the NH2 or the COOH termini of the receptor. Compared with tumors that responded to MPA (n = 31), there was a significant decrease in the intensity and extent of AR immunoreactivity with both AR antisera in tumors from nonresponders (n = 52). Whereas only a single AR immunostaining pattern was detected in responders to MPA, reflecting concordance of immunoreactivity with the two AR antisera, tumors from nonresponders exhibited four distinct AR immunostaining patterns: (a) concordance with the two antibodies (31%), (b) staining only with the COOH-terminal antibody (33%), (c) staining only with the NH2-terminal antibody (22%), or (d) no immunoreactivity with either NH2- or COOH-terminal antibody (14%). DNA sequencing and functional analysis identified inactivating missense gene mutations in the ligand-binding domain of the AR in tumors from two of nine nonresponders positive with the NH2-terminal AR antisera but negative for COOH-terminal immunoreactivity and lacking specific, high-affinity dihydrotestosterone binding in tumor cytosol fractions. Tumors with more AR than the median level (37 fmol/mg protein) had significantly lower levels of PR (30 fmol/mg protein) than tumors with low AR (PR; 127 fmol/mg protein) despite comparable levels of ER. Ligand-dependent activation of the AR in human T47D and MCF-7 breast cancer cells resulted in inhibition of estradiol-stimulated cell proliferation and a reduction in the capacity of the ER to induce expression of the PR. These effects could be reversed using a specific AR antisense oligonucleotide. Increasing the ratio of AR to ER resulted in a greater androgen-dependent inhibition of ER function. Collectively, these data suggest that reduced levels of AR or impaired AR function contribute to the failure of MPA therapy potentially due to abrogation of the inhibitory effect of AR on ER signaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16166329     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  25 in total

1.  Linkage of progestin and epidermal growth factor signaling: phosphorylation of progesterone receptors mediates transcriptional hypersensitivity and increased ligand-independent breast cancer cell growth.

Authors:  Andrea R Daniel; Ming Qiu; Emily J Faivre; Julie Hanson Ostrander; Andrew Skildum; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Research resource: interplay between the genomic and transcriptional networks of androgen receptor and estrogen receptor α in luminal breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Eleanor F Need; Luke A Selth; Tiffany J Harris; Stephen N Birrell; Wayne D Tilley; Grant Buchanan
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-09-28

3.  Corepressor effect on androgen receptor activity varies with the length of the CAG encoded polyglutamine repeat and is dependent on receptor/corepressor ratio in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Grant Buchanan; Eleanor F Need; Jeffrey M Barrett; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Vanessa C Thompson; Lisa M Butler; Villis R Marshall; Wayne D Tilley; Gerhard A Coetzee
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 4.  Family Matters: Collaboration and Conflict Among the Steroid Receptors Raises a Need for Group Therapy.

Authors:  Matthew J Sikora
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.736

5.  Androgen receptor overexpression induces tamoxifen resistance in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Francesca De Amicis; Janagi Thirugnansampanthan; Yukun Cui; Jennifer Selever; Amanda Beyer; Irma Parra; Nancy L Weigel; Matthew H Herynk; Anna Tsimelzon; Michael T Lewis; Gary C Chamness; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Sebastiano Andò; Suzanne A W Fuqua
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  AR collaborates with ERα in aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer.

Authors:  Yassine Rechoum; Daniela Rovito; Domenico Iacopetta; Ines Barone; Sebastiano Andò; Nancy L Weigel; Bert W O'Malley; Powel H Brown; Suzanne A W Fuqua
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer: relationship with clinicopathological factors and biomarkers.

Authors:  Yoshinari Ogawa; Eishu Hai; Kanako Matsumoto; Katsumi Ikeda; Shinya Tokunaga; Hisashi Nagahara; Katsunobu Sakurai; Takeshi Inoue; Yukio Nishiguchi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Androgen receptor as a targeted therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joseph P Garay; Ben H Park
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  The Role of Androgen Receptor in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Domenico Iacopetta; Yassine Rechoum; Suzanne Aw Fuqua
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Mech       Date:  2012

10.  Androgen and estrogen receptor-mediated mechanisms of testosterone action in male rat pelvic autonomic ganglia.

Authors:  T D Purves-Tyson; M S Arshi; D J Handelsman; Y Cheng; J R Keast
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.