Literature DB >> 16164478

Shared Care, elder and family member skills used to manage burden.

Margaret Sebern1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this paper is to further develop the construct of Shared Care by comparing and contrasting it to related research, and to show how the construct can be used to guide research and practice.
BACKGROUND: While researchers have identified negative outcomes for family caregivers caused by providing care, less is known about positive aspects of family care for both members of a family dyad. Understanding family care relationships is important to nurses because family participation in the care of chronically ill elders is necessary to achieve optimal outcomes from nursing interventions. A previous naturalistic inquiry identified a new construct, Shared Care, which was used to describe a family care interaction that contributed to positive care outcomes.
METHODS: A literature review was carried out using the databases Medline, CINAHL, and Psych-info and the keywords home care, care receiver, disability, family, communication, decision-making and reciprocity. The results of the review were integrated to suggest how Shared Care could be used to study care difficulties and guide interventions.
RESULTS: The literature confirmed the importance of dyad relationships in family care. Shared Care extended previous conceptualizations of family care by capturing three critical components: communication, decision-making, and reciprocity. Shared Care provides a structure to expand the conceptualization of family care to include both members of a care dyad and account for positive and negative aspects of care.
CONCLUSIONS: The extended view provided by the construct of Shared Care offers practitioners and scholars tools to use in the context of our ageing population to improve the effectiveness of family care relationships.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16164478     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

1.  Ethical Dimensions and Filial Caregiving.

Authors:  Ellen F McCarty; Constance S Hendricks; Denisha L Hendricks; Kathleen M McCarty
Journal:  Online J Health Ethics       Date:  2008

2.  Caregiving in heart failure: relationship quality is associated with caregiver benefit finding and caregiver burden.

Authors:  Hillary D Lum; Daphne Lo; Stephanie Hooker; David B Bekelman
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  A pilot randomized clinical trial of a teamwork intervention for heart failure care dyads.

Authors:  Elliane Irani; Atsadaporn Niyomyart; Mary A Dolansky; John Paul Stephens; Stephen J Ganocy; Richard A Josephson; Ronald L Hickman
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Dyadic heart failure care types: qualitative evidence for a novel typology.

Authors:  Harleah G Buck; Lisa Kitko; Judith E Hupcey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Assessing the response of patients and spousal/partner caregivers to a new instrument measuring dyadic heart failure care types.

Authors:  Harleah G Buck; Cheryl H Zambroski; Judith E Hupcey
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.908

6.  Registered Nurses' Perceptions about the Situation of Family Caregivers to Patients with Heart Failure - A Focus Group Interview Study.

Authors:  Annelie K Gusdal; Karin Josefsson; Eva Thors Adolfsson; Lene Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.