Literature DB >> 16163842

Comparison of microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism markers for the genetic analysis of a Galloway cattle population.

David López Herráeza1, Holger Schäfer, Jörn Mosner, Hans-Rudolf Fries, Michael Wink.   

Abstract

Highly informative genetic markers are essential for efficient management of cattle populations, as well as for food safety. After a decade of domination by microsatellite markers, a new type of genetic marker, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), has recently appeared on the scene. In the present study, the exclusion power of both kinds of markers with regards to individual identification and parental analysis was directly compared in a Galloway cattle population. Seventeen bovine microsatellites were distributed in three incremental marker sets (10, 14 and 17 microsatellite markers) and used for cattle genotyping. A set of 43 bovine SNP was used for genotyping the same cattle population. The accuracy of both kinds of markers in individual identification was evaluated using probability of identity estimations. These were 2.4 x 10(-8) for the 10 microsatellite set, 2.3 x 10(-11) for the 14 microsatellite set, and 1.4 x 10(-13) for the 17 microsatellite marker set. For the 43 SNP markers, the estimated probability of identity was 5.3 x 10(-11). The exclusion power of both kinds of markers in parental analysis was evaluated using paternity exclusion estimations, and, in addition to this, by estimation of the parental exclusion probability in 18 Galloway family trios. Paternity exclusion was estimated to be over 99% for microsatellites, and approx. 98% for SNP. Both, microsatellite and SNP sets of markers showed similar parental exclusion probabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16163842     DOI: 10.1515/znc-2005-7-821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Naturforsch C J Biosci        ISSN: 0341-0382


  7 in total

1.  A bioinformatic pipeline for identifying informative SNP panels for parentage assignment from RADseq data.

Authors:  Kimberly R Andrews; Jennifer R Adams; E Frances Cassirer; Raina K Plowright; Colby Gardner; Maggie Dwire; Paul A Hohenlohe; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 7.090

2.  Isolation and characterization of SNP variation at 90 anonymous loci in the banded wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus).

Authors:  Emily R A Cramer; L Stenzler; A L Talaba; C A Makarewich; S L Vehrencamp; I J Lovette
Journal:  Conserv Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Comparison of the effectiveness of microsatellites and SNP panels for genetic identification, traceability and assessment of parentage in an inbred Angus herd.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Daniel E Goszczynski; Juan P Lirón; Egle E Villegas-Castagnasso; Mónica H Carino; María V Ripoli; Andrés Rogberg-Muñoz; Diego M Posik; Pilar Peral-García; Guillermo Giovambattista
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 4.  Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.

Authors:  Alexander I Putman; Ignazio Carbone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation - an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri.

Authors:  Martin C Fischer; Christian Rellstab; Marianne Leuzinger; Marie Roumet; Felix Gugerli; Kentaro K Shimizu; Rolf Holderegger; Alex Widmer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Reintroductions and genetic introgression from domestic pigs have shaped the genetic population structure of Northwest European wild boar.

Authors:  Daniel J Goedbloed; Pim van Hooft; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Katharina Langenbeck; Walburga Lutz; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Sip E van Wieren; Ron C Ydenberg; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  An empirical comparison of population genetic analyses using microsatellite and SNP data for a species of conservation concern.

Authors:  Shawna J Zimmerman; Cameron L Aldridge; Sara J Oyler-McCance
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.