RATIONALE: Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) disrupts working memory. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved in the processing of working memory, and its medial portion (mPFC) is part of a brain reward circuit as constituted by the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the involvement of the mPFC in the effects of Delta(9)-THC on spatial working memory. METHODS: Ten male Wistar rats well-trained in a radial arm maze and with bilateral cannula implanted in the mPFC received Delta(9)-THC intra-cortically (Delta(9)-THC IC) at doses of 0 (VEH), 32, 100 or 180 microg, 5 min before a 5-s or a 1-h delayed task in order to measure a short- or long-term spatial working memory, respectively. By contrast, 11 other animals received Delta(9)-THC intraperitoneally (Delta(9)-THC IP) at doses of 0 (VEH), 0.32, 1 or 1.8 mg/kg, 30 min before a 5-s or a 1-h delayed task. Additionally, after a 15-day washout, the effect of an IP or IC pre-exposure of Delta(9)-THC was examined by repeating both dose-effect curves in a crossover order for the routes of administration. RESULTS: Delta(9)-THC IP produced significantly larger number of errors at doses of 0.32 or 1 mg/kg as compared to VEH in the 1-h post-delay performance. Delta(9)-THC 100 microg IC also produced significantly larger number of errors as compared to VEH and also to the other doses (32 or 180 microg) IC in the 1-h post-delay performance. Previous exposure to Delta(9)-THC IP or IC did not significantly affect the disruptive effect of this cannabinoid. CONCLUSIONS: Delta(9)-THC administered directly in the mPFC impaired 1-h delayed task in the radial arm maze in a manner similar to that observed for its systemic administration, suggesting that the mPFC is involved in the disruptive effects of Delta(9)-THC on spatial working memory.
RATIONALE: Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) disrupts working memory. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved in the processing of working memory, and its medial portion (mPFC) is part of a brain reward circuit as constituted by the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the involvement of the mPFC in the effects of Delta(9)-THC on spatial working memory. METHODS: Ten male Wistar rats well-trained in a radial arm maze and with bilateral cannula implanted in the mPFC received Delta(9)-THC intra-cortically (Delta(9)-THC IC) at doses of 0 (VEH), 32, 100 or 180 microg, 5 min before a 5-s or a 1-h delayed task in order to measure a short- or long-term spatial working memory, respectively. By contrast, 11 other animals received Delta(9)-THC intraperitoneally (Delta(9)-THC IP) at doses of 0 (VEH), 0.32, 1 or 1.8 mg/kg, 30 min before a 5-s or a 1-h delayed task. Additionally, after a 15-day washout, the effect of an IP or IC pre-exposure of Delta(9)-THC was examined by repeating both dose-effect curves in a crossover order for the routes of administration. RESULTS:Delta(9)-THC IP produced significantly larger number of errors at doses of 0.32 or 1 mg/kg as compared to VEH in the 1-h post-delay performance. Delta(9)-THC 100 microg IC also produced significantly larger number of errors as compared to VEH and also to the other doses (32 or 180 microg) IC in the 1-h post-delay performance. Previous exposure to Delta(9)-THC IP or IC did not significantly affect the disruptive effect of this cannabinoid. CONCLUSIONS:Delta(9)-THC administered directly in the mPFC impaired 1-h delayed task in the radial arm maze in a manner similar to that observed for its systemic administration, suggesting that the mPFC is involved in the disruptive effects of Delta(9)-THC on spatial working memory.
Authors: Matthew N Hill; Larissa M Froese; Anna C Morrish; Jane C Sun; Stan B Floresco Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-06-03 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Hanna J Szkudlarek; Sagar J Desai; Justine Renard; Brian Pereira; Christopher Norris; Christina E L Jobson; Nagalingam Rajakumar; Brian L Allman; Steven R Laviolette Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Peter J Winsauer; Patricia E Molina; Angela M Amedee; Catalin M Filipeanu; Robin R McGoey; Dana A Troxclair; Edith M Walker; Leslie L Birke; Curtis Vande Stouwe; Jessica M Howard; Stuart T Leonard; Joseph M Moerschbaecher; Peter B Lewis Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Emma Puighermanal; Arnau Busquets-Garcia; Rafael Maldonado; Andrés Ozaita Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Laura E Wise; Kelly A Long; Rehab A Abdullah; Jonathan Z Long; Benjamin F Cravatt; Aron H Lichtman Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Claudio Zanettini; Leigh V Panlilio; Mano Alicki; Steven R Goldberg; József Haller; Sevil Yasar Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 3.558