Literature DB >> 16163171

The role of FDG-PET imaging in the management of lymphoma.

Lale Kostakoglu1, John P Leonard, Morton Coleman, Stanley J Goldsmith.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has become a useful imaging modality in the staging and treatment evaluation algorithm for lymphoma, providing unique metabolic information. Increased FDG uptake in lymphoma tumor masses is a function of increased anaerobic metabolism and longer residence time of FDG in malignant cells relative to most normal tissues. The information provided by FDG-PET appears to result in greater sensitivity compared to anatomic imaging modalities, particularly computed tomography (CT). Over several decades CT has been the principal imaging modality for the staging and restaging of lymphoma, although it can have significant shortcomings stemming from its sized-based criteria, particularly in the post-therapy setting. Gallium-67 (Ga-67) scintigraphy has played an important role in monitoring response to therapy; however, the sensitivity of Ga-67 depends on histologic subtype of lymphoma, size, and location of disease. Published results suggest that FDG-PET is superior to Ga-67 imaging and equal or superior to CT for the detection of nodal and extranodal lymphoma at initial staging. Furthermore, persistent FDG uptake during and after chemotherapy has a high sensitivity and specificity for prediction of subsequent relapse. While in some cases FDG-PET imaging can yield findings that prompt a change in treatment strategy, prospective studies are necessary to better establish the ability of routine FDG-PET imaging to impact therapeutic outcomes for patients with lymphoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16163171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1543-0790


  7 in total

1.  The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric lymph-node acute lymphoblastic leukemia involvement.

Authors:  Angelina Cistaro; Francesco Saglio; Sebastian Asaftei; Piercarlo Fania; Massimo Berger; Franca Fagioli
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-06

Review 2.  Positron emission tomographic scans in lymphoma: convention and controversy.

Authors:  Stephen M Ansell; James O Armitage
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Utility of 18F-FDG-PET for detecting acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case series of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia without hematological symptoms.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ikawa; Mika Takenaka; Yuta Sakai; Kazuhiro Noguchi; Masaki Fukuda; Toshihiro Fujiki; Rie Kuroda; Shintaro Mase; Raita Araki; Hideaki Maeba; Ryosei Nishimura; Akihiro Yachie; Taizo Wada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Clinical significance of post-treatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in cervical lymph nodes in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Young-Sil An; Joon-Kee Yoon; Su Jin Lee; Seong Hyun Jeong; Hyun Woo Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Nodal staging.

Authors:  Skandadas Ganeshalingam; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Noninvasive phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging predicts outcome to first-line chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Fernando Arias-Mendoza; Geoffrey S Payne; Kristen Zakian; Marion Stubbs; Owen A O'Connor; Hamed Mojahed; Mitchell R Smith; Adam J Schwarz; Amita Shukla-Dave; Franklyn Howe; Harish Poptani; Seung-Cheol Lee; Ruth Pettengel; Steven J Schuster; David Cunningham; Arend Heerschap; Jerry D Glickson; John R Griffiths; Jason A Koutcher; Martin O Leach; Truman R Brown
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin's or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma?

Authors:  Güven Çetin; M Ali Çıkrıkçıoğlu; Tuba Özkan; Cumali Karatoprak; M Cem Ar; Ahmet Emre Eşkazan; Mesut Ayer; Abdullah Cerit; Kübra Gözübenli; Betül Börkü Uysal; Simge Erdem; Nurhan Ergül; Gamze Tatar; T Fikret Çermik
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.831

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.