Literature DB >> 16163091

Vacuum-assisted closure for sternal wounds: a first-line therapeutic management approach.

Jayant P Agarwal1, Michael Ogilvie, Liza C Wu, Robert F Lohman, Lawrence J Gottlieb, Mietka Franczyk, David H Song.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted closure therapy has gained widespread use since its introduction in 1997. Previous studies have attributed significant benefit to its use for treatment of sternal wounds with or without mediastinitis. Management of sternal wounds with this therapy has been shown to decrease the number of dressing changes, reduce the time between débridement and definitive closure, and reduce costs associated with a protracted course of in-hospital dressing changes. The therapy has been used both as a bridge between débridement and definitive closure and as a catalyst to secondary sternal-wound healing.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of 103 patients who underwent vacuum-assisted closure therapy after median sternotomy between June of 1999 and March of 2004 at a single institution. The wounds were classified as sterile wounds, superficial sternal infections, and mediastinitis. The wound closure device, consisting of a polyurethane sponge and evacuation tube with in-line suction, was applied sterilely to all wounds over a layer of Acticoat.
RESULTS: Vacuum-assisted closure was utilized in the treatment of sternal wounds for 103 patients (67 male patients and 36 female patients) whose mean age was 52 years (range, 3 months to 91 years). Patient comorbidities included diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage renal disease, immunosuppression, and others. Sixty-four percent of the patients had a diagnosis of mediastinitis; 36 percent had either superficial infections or a sterile wound. The therapy was utilized for an average period of 11 days per patient. Sixty-eight percent of the patients (70 of 103) had definitive chest closure with open reduction internal fixation and/or flap closure. The remaining 32 percent had no definitive closure method. The overall mortality rate was 28 percent (29 of 103 patients), although no deaths were directly related to use of the therapy, and only four deaths resulted from sepsis as a consequence of mediastinitis.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors report the largest series of patients treated with this therapy for post-sternotomy sternal wounds and believe it is safe and effective as a first-line therapy in the management of sternal wounds. The mortality rate from their study represents the patients' underlying disease process and comorbidities and is not a reflection of complications associated with the therapy. Vacuum-assisted closure therapy has been shown to decrease wound edema, decrease the time to definitive closure, and reduce wound bacterial colony counts. The authors have implemented the therapy for most patients with sternal wounds/mediastinitis at their institution, and believe it should be a standard protocol in the first-line management of these types of wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16163091     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000178401.52143.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  22 in total

1.  Topical negative pressure for the treatment of neonatal post-sternotomy wound dehiscence.

Authors:  J Hardwicke; H Richards; J Jagadeesan; T Jones; R Lester
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Topical negative pressure wound therapy: a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds.

Authors:  Estas Bovill; Paul E Banwell; Luc Teot; Elof Eriksson; Colin Song; Jim Mahoney; Ronny Gustafsson; Raymund Horch; Anand Deva; Ian Whitworth
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  The 'Two Bridges Technique' for sternal wound closure. The use of vacuum-assisted closure for the treatment of deep sternal wound defects: a centre-specific technique.

Authors:  Karl Waked; Philippe Ballaux; Dominique Goossens; Koen Cathenis
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The effect and safety after extended use of continuous negative pressure of 75 mmHg over mesh and allodermis graft on open sternal wound from oversized heart transplant in a 3-month-old infant.

Authors:  Kangwoo Nathan Lee; Dong Man Seo; Joon Pio Hong
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Comparison of vacuum-assisted closure device and conservative treatment for fasciotomy wound healing in ischaemia-reperfusion syndrome: preliminary results.

Authors:  Karaca Saziye; Cikirikcioglu Mustafa; Uckay Ilker; Kalangos Afksendyios
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  V.A.C. Therapy in the management of paediatric wounds: clinical review and experience.

Authors:  Mona Baharestani; Ibrahim Amjad; Kim Bookout; Tatjana Fleck; Allen Gabriel; David Kaufman; Shannon Stone McCord; Donald C Moores; Oluyinka O Olutoye; Jorge D Salazar; David H Song; Steven Teich; Subhas Gupta
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Clinical outcome of diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy and the transition from acute care to home care.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wu; David G Armstrong
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Management of Combat Wounds: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Sanjay Maurya; Prem Singh Bhandari
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Vacuum-assisted closure of a large palmar defect after debriding a midpalmar tuberculous abscess.

Authors:  Gavin C W Kang; Andrew Yam
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  The Impact of Deep Sternal Wound Infection on Mortality and Resource Utilization: A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Erika D Sears; Lizi Wu; Jennifer F Waljee; Adeyiza O Momoh; Lin Zhong; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.