Literature DB >> 16162764

Cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Drahomir Aujesky1, Kenneth J Smith, Jacques Cornuz, Mark S Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) appears to be safe and effective for treating pulmonary embolism (PE), but its cost-effectiveness has not been assessed.
METHODS: We built a Markov state-transition model to evaluate the medical and economic outcomes of a 6-day course with fixed-dose LMWH or adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) in a hypothetical cohort of 60-year-old patients with acute submassive PE. Probabilities for clinical outcomes were obtained from a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Cost estimates were derived from Medicare reimbursement data and other sources. The base-case analysis used an inpatient setting, whereas secondary analyses examined early discharge and outpatient treatment with LMWH. Using a societal perspective, strategies were compared based on lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
RESULTS: Inpatient treatment costs were higher for LMWH treatment than for UFH (dollar 13,001 vs dollar 12,780), but LMWH yielded a greater number of QALYs than did UFH (7.677 QALYs vs 7.493 QALYs). The incremental costs of dollar 221 and the corresponding incremental effectiveness of 0.184 QALYs resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of dollar 1,209/QALY. Our results were highly robust in sensitivity analyses. LMWH became cost-saving if the daily pharmacy costs for LMWH were < dollar 51, if > or = 8% of patients were eligible for early discharge, or if > or = 5% of patients could be treated entirely as outpatients.
CONCLUSION: For inpatient treatment of PE, the use of LMWH is cost-effective compared to UFH. Early discharge or outpatient treatment in suitable patients with PE would lead to substantial cost savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162764     DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  13 in total

1.  Massachusetts Health Reform Cost Less and Was More Effective for Uninsured Individuals With Venous Thromboembolism: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Alok Kapoor; Nicholas Shaffer; Amresh Hanchate; Mark Roberts; Kenneth Smith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in Acute Non-massive Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anurag Bajaj; Parul Rathor; Vishal Sehgal; Besher Kabak; Ajay Shetty; Ossama Al Masalmeh; Srikanth Hosur
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Minimizing costs for treating deep vein thrombosis: the role for fondaparinux.

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; William L Jackson; Lisa K Moores; Theodore E Warkentin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; D Scott Obrosky; Roslyn A Stone; Thomas E Auble; Arnaud Perrier; Jacques Cornuz; Pierre-Marie Roy; Michael J Fine
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  The direct medical costs associated with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Natasha Nanwa; Nicole Mittmann; Sandra Knowles; Claudia Bucci; Rita Selby; Neil Shear; Scott E Walker; William Geerts
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost modeling of preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration to guide surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; James P Moriarty; Amy C Degnim; Melissa S Gregg; Jason S Egginton; Kirsten Hall Long
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Anita Rajasekhar; Saskia Middeldorp; Claire McLintock; Marc A Rodger; Andra H James; Sara R Vazquez; Ian A Greer; John J Riva; Meha Bhatt; Nicole Schwab; Danielle Barrett; Andrea LaHaye; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment of venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban compared with combined low molecular weight heparin/vitamin K antagonist.

Authors:  Luke Bamber; Dominic Muston; Euan McLeod; Anne Guillermin; Julia Lowin; Raj Patel
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2015-06-11

9.  An economic evaluation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis strategies in critically ill trauma patients at risk of bleeding.

Authors:  T Carter Chiasson; Braden J Manns; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  PERFORM: Pulmonary embolism risk score for mortality in computed tomographic pulmonary angiography-confirmed patients.

Authors:  Shuili Yu; Honglu Zhou; Yang Li; Jianfeng Song; Jinyan Shao; Xuanyi Wang; Zichen Xie; Chao Qiu; Keyu Sun
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.