STUDY OBJECTIVES: An inverse relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of lung cancer, suggesting that leanness is a risk factor for lung cancer, has been reported in previous studies. In order to evaluate the risk of lung cancer associated with lower levels of BMI in preclinical patients, we conducted a case-control study based on the results of community mass screening. DESIGN: The relationship between BMI (at the time of diagnosis, and at 1 to 5 years prior to diagnosis) and lung cancer was investigated in a case-control study of 363 lung cancer cases and 1,089 control subjects conducted between April 1993 and March 2003. Control subjects were selected from mass-screening subjects with no abnormalities on chest radiography and routine laboratory tests. RESULTS: In men, an inverse association between BMI and lung cancer was observed after adjustment for age and smoking (BMI < 20.8; range of the referent group, > or = 22.9 to < 25.0; odds ratio, 1.9; p = 0.0025; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 2.9). In women, however, no association was found between BMI and lung cancer (BMI < 20.8, p = 0.3868; and BMI </= 25.0, p = 0.4603, respectively). In addition, a negative association between BMI at 4 to 5 years prior to diagnosis and lung cancer was not observed in either gender (men, p = 0.2937 to 0.5783; women, p = 0.2042 to 0.9326). CONCLUSIONS: Our present study indicated the possibility that the previously reported association between leanness and the risk of lung cancer in women was not correct, and this apparent association might be influenced by other factors such as smoking and smoking-related respiratory diseases. A larger-scale cohort study combined with mass-screening project will confirm our results.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: An inverse relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of lung cancer, suggesting that leanness is a risk factor for lung cancer, has been reported in previous studies. In order to evaluate the risk of lung cancer associated with lower levels of BMI in preclinical patients, we conducted a case-control study based on the results of community mass screening. DESIGN: The relationship between BMI (at the time of diagnosis, and at 1 to 5 years prior to diagnosis) and lung cancer was investigated in a case-control study of 363 lung cancer cases and 1,089 control subjects conducted between April 1993 and March 2003. Control subjects were selected from mass-screening subjects with no abnormalities on chest radiography and routine laboratory tests. RESULTS: In men, an inverse association between BMI and lung cancer was observed after adjustment for age and smoking (BMI < 20.8; range of the referent group, > or = 22.9 to < 25.0; odds ratio, 1.9; p = 0.0025; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 2.9). In women, however, no association was found between BMI and lung cancer (BMI < 20.8, p = 0.3868; and BMI </= 25.0, p = 0.4603, respectively). In addition, a negative association between BMI at 4 to 5 years prior to diagnosis and lung cancer was not observed in either gender (men, p = 0.2937 to 0.5783; women, p = 0.2042 to 0.9326). CONCLUSIONS: Our present study indicated the possibility that the previously reported association between leanness and the risk of lung cancer in women was not correct, and this apparent association might be influenced by other factors such as smoking and smoking-related respiratory diseases. A larger-scale cohort study combined with mass-screening project will confirm our results.
Authors: Gabriella Andreotti; Lifang Hou; Laura E Beane Freeman; Rajeev Mahajan; Stella Koutros; Joseph Coble; Jay Lubin; Aaron Blair; Jane A Hoppin; Michael Alavanja Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-08-22 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Lee W Jones; Francis Ali-Osman; Eric Lipp; Jennifer E Marcello; Bridget McCarthy; Lucie McCoy; Terri Rice; Margaret Wrensch; Dora Il'yasova Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-09-14 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: David S Gierada; Preethi Guniganti; Blake J Newman; Mark T Dransfield; Paul A Kvale; David A Lynch; Thomas K Pilgram Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ana I Pérez-Hernández; Victoria Catalán; Javier Gómez-Ambrosi; Amaia Rodríguez; Gema Frühbeck Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 5.555