Literature DB >> 16162376

Removal of third molars in Scottish oral and maxillofacial surgery units: a review of practice in 1995 and 2002.

C M Dunne1, C A Goodall, J A Leitch, D I Russell.   

Abstract

We audited the practice of removal of third molars in Scottish oral and maxillofacial (OMFS) units in 1995 and in 2002. We collected data from anonymous structured postal questionnaires from 12 Scottish OMFS units about patients referred for removal of third molars in 1995 and 11 units in 2002. The percentage of patients who had no treatment increased from 11% in 1995 (102/928) to 16% in 2002 (66/412). The incidence of prophylactic removal of third molars decreased between the two periods. Removal of third molars under local anaesthesia with or without sedation increased from 35% (325/928) in 1995 to 54% (223/412) in 2002. Removal of third molars under general anaesthesia decreased from 54% in 1995 to 30% in 2002.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162376     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  3 in total

1.  International benchmarking of hospitalisations for impacted teeth: a 10-year retrospective study from the United Kingdom, France and Australia.

Authors:  A A Anjrini; E Kruger; M Tennant
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Hospitalisation for the surgical removal of impacted teeth: Has Australia followed international trends?

Authors:  Roslind Preethi George; Estie Kruger; Marc Tennant
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-08-31

3.  Local vs general anaesthesia in the development of neurosensory disturbances after mandibular third molars extraction: A retrospective study of 534 cases.

Authors:  F Costantinides; M Biasotto; M Maglione; R Di Lenarda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-11-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.