AIMS: Subspeciation of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus (CFF) and Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis (CFV) is important for international animal import regulations. Phenotyping can be unreliable, and genotyping by techniques like pulsed field gel electrophoresis is difficult in routine diagnostic laboratories. A PCR subspeciation technique has been reported [Aust Vet J (1997) 75, 827]; we aimed to develop this PCR and investigate its use on UK C. fetus isolates. METHODS AND RESULTS: We augmented the PCR with further primers, and tested 76 isolates of C. fetus and 16 isolates of other Campylobacter spp. PCR failed to correlate well with phenotyping, especially for CFV. We characterized the amplicon of the CFV-specific primers (reported as plasmid derived, but unavailable on the public databases); and predicted a parA gene sequence, anticipated to be plasmid-associated. However, although plasmid isolations from selected CFV isolates demonstrated the presence of several plasmids, there was no correlation between plasmid profile and PCR result. Further, the parA sequence was not detected by PCR in any of the plasmid bands. CONCLUSIONS: This PCR is not suitable for subspeciation of C. fetus in the UK. The results suggest that this is a reflection of the presence of an unusual clone of CFV currently present in cattle in this country. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: PCR cannot substitute for phenotyping of C. fetus isolates in the UK. The reasons for failure of PCR genotyping may reflect local strains and/or plasmid profiles. Further study is required to better elucidate molecular sub-speciation of C. fetus.
AIMS: Subspeciation of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus (CFF) and Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis (CFV) is important for international animal import regulations. Phenotyping can be unreliable, and genotyping by techniques like pulsed field gel electrophoresis is difficult in routine diagnostic laboratories. A PCR subspeciation technique has been reported [Aust Vet J (1997) 75, 827]; we aimed to develop this PCR and investigate its use on UK C. fetus isolates. METHODS AND RESULTS: We augmented the PCR with further primers, and tested 76 isolates of C. fetus and 16 isolates of other Campylobacter spp. PCR failed to correlate well with phenotyping, especially for CFV. We characterized the amplicon of the CFV-specific primers (reported as plasmid derived, but unavailable on the public databases); and predicted a parA gene sequence, anticipated to be plasmid-associated. However, although plasmid isolations from selected CFV isolates demonstrated the presence of several plasmids, there was no correlation between plasmid profile and PCR result. Further, the parA sequence was not detected by PCR in any of the plasmid bands. CONCLUSIONS: This PCR is not suitable for subspeciation of C. fetus in the UK. The results suggest that this is a reflection of the presence of an unusual clone of CFV currently present in cattle in this country. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: PCR cannot substitute for phenotyping of C. fetus isolates in the UK. The reasons for failure of PCR genotyping may reflect local strains and/or plasmid profiles. Further study is required to better elucidate molecular sub-speciation of C. fetus.
Authors: Marcel A P van Bergen; Kate E Dingle; Martin C J Maiden; Diane G Newell; Linda van der Graaf-Van Bloois; Jos P M van Putten; Jaap A Wagenaar Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Atif Elbrissi; Y A Sabeil; Khalda A Khalifa; Khalid Enan; Osama M Khair; A M El Hussein Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod Date: 2017-02-04 Impact factor: 1.559
Authors: Alvaro García-Guerra; Cheryl L Waldner; Andrea Pellegrino; Nicole Macdonald; Bonnie Chaban; Janet E Hill; Steven H Hendrick Journal: Can J Vet Res Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.310
Authors: Sabine Kienesberger; Caroline Schober Trummler; Astrid Fauster; Silvia Lang; Hanna Sprenger; Gregor Gorkiewicz; Ellen L Zechner Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Paula M Moolhuijzen; Ala E Lew-Tabor; Bartosz M Wlodek; Fernán G Agüero; Diego J Comerci; Rodolfo A Ugalde; Daniel O Sanchez; Rudi Appels; Matthew Bellgard Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 3.605
Authors: Sabine Kienesberger; Gregor Gorkiewicz; Martina M Joainig; Sylvia R Scheicher; Eva Leitner; Ellen L Zechner Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2007-05-18 Impact factor: 4.792