Literature DB >> 16162199

Measuring surgical recovery: the study of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Simon Bergman1, Liane S Feldman, Nancy E Mayo, Franco Carli, Maurice Anidjar, Dennis R Klassen, Christopher G Andrew, Melina C Vassiliou, Donna D Stanbridge, Gerald M Fried.   

Abstract

Following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), recovery has only been studied using traditional outcomes, subjective and confounded by comorbidity and psychosocial variables. The purpose of this study is to estimate surgical recovery following LDN using standardized, validated instruments and to compare this recovery profile to that obtained with traditional measures. This was a prospective study of patients undergoing LDN at a single institution between September 2001 and January 2004 (n = 35). At baseline and 4 weeks following surgery, functional exercise capacity was measured using the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and health-related quality of life was assessed with the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, including physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. Patients' self-assessment of recovery and time to resumption of regular activities was ascertained. At follow-up (median 29 days), patients' 6MWT was lower by a median of 30 m (p = 0.07) and PCS decreased from 57.1 to 42.3 (p = 0.0001), whereas MCS remained constant. Overall, length of stay, return to activities and patient-stated recovery were inadequate outcomes for classifying patient recovery using 6MWT and PCS as the reference standards. Four weeks following LLDN, patients have returned to baseline exercise capacity, but not baseline general physical health. Traditional measures of recovery are incomplete descriptors of recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162199     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01054.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  5 in total

1.  Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: HARP-trial.

Authors:  Leonienke F C Dols; Niels F M Kok; Turkan Terkivatan; T C Khe Tran; Frank C H d'Ancona; Johan F Langenhuijsen; Ingrid R A M zur Borg; Ian P J Alwayn; Mark P Hendriks; Ine M Dooper; Willem Weimar; Jan N M Ijzermans
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 2.  Psychiatric aspects of organ transplantation in critical care.

Authors:  Andrea DiMartini; Catherine Crone; Marian Fireman; Mary Amanda Dew
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  "First, do no harm": monitoring outcomes during the transition from open to laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a Canadian centre.

Authors:  Simon Bergman; Liane S Feldman; Maurice Anidjar; Sebastian V Demyttenaere; Franco Carli; Peter Metrakos; Jean Tchervenkov; Steven Paraskevas; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Prospective Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life and Emotional Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation over 6 Years.

Authors:  Konstadina Griva; Jan Stygall; Juan Hui Ng; Andrew Davenport; Mike J Harrison; Stanton Newman
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Investigation of the physical and psychosocial outcomes after living kidney donation - a multicenter cohort study (SoLKiD - Safety of Living Kidney Donors).

Authors:  Barbara Suwelack; Viktoriya Wörmann; Klaus Berger; Joachim Gerß; Heiner Wolters; Frank Vitinius; Markus Burgmer
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.