Literature DB >> 16162027

Using contingent choice methods to assess consumer preferences about health plan design.

M Susan Marquis1, Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin, Kanika Kapur, Jill M Yegian.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: American insurers are designing products to contain health care costs by making consumers financially responsible for their choices. Little is known about how consumers will view these new designs. Our objective is to examine consumer preferences for selected benefit designs.
METHODS: We used the contingent choice method to assess willingness to pay for six health plan attributes. Our sample included subscribers to individual health insurance products in California, US. We used fitted logistic regression models to explore how preferences for the more generous attributes varied with the additional premium and with the characteristics of the subscriber.
RESULTS: High quality was the most highly valued attribute based on the amounts consumers report they are willing to pay. They were also willing to pay substantial monthly premiums to reduce their overall financial risk. Individuals in lower health were willing to pay more to reduce their financial risk than individuals in better health. DISCUSSION/
CONCLUSION: Consumers may prefer tiered-benefit designs to those that involve overall increases in cost sharing. More consumer information is needed to help consumers better evaluate the costs and benefits of their insurance choices.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162027     DOI: 10.2165/00148365-200504020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  1 in total

1.  "It's not easy to acknowledge that I'm ill": a qualitative investigation into the health seeking behavior of rural Palestinian women.

Authors:  Linda Majaj; Majed Nassar; Manuela De Allegri
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.809

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.