Literature DB >> 16161745

Impact of smoking on marginal bone loss.

Daniel Nitzan1, Avi Mamlider, Liran Levin, Devorah Schwartz-Arad.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare marginal implant bone loss (MBL), survival, and radiographic evidence of success of dental implants among smokers and nonsmokers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive records of 161 patients (aged 23 to 89 years, mean 57 years) treated with a total of 646 implants between the years 1995 and 1998 were examined. Patients were divided into 3 groups: nonsmokers, moderate smokers, and heavy smokers. Tobacco exposure was calculated by cigarettes per day and by pack-years. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 7 years (mean 3.8 years). Postoperative panoramic radiographs obtained before implant exposure and annually thereafter were analyzed for MBL changes. The influence of smoking and other variables on MBL was analyzed at all implant sites.
RESULTS: Generally, smokers had more MBL than nonsmokers (0.153 +/- 0.092 mm and 0.047 +/- 0.048 mm, respectively; P < .001). When each jaw was examined separately, smoking had a greater effect on MBL in the maxilla than in the mandible (0.158 +/- 0.171 mm versus 0.146 +/- 0.158 mm, respectively; P < .001). Furthermore, in the maxilla, heavy smokers had the greatest amount of MBL (0.1897 +/- 0.1825 mm), followed by moderate smokers (0.123 +/- 0.156 mm) and nonsmokers (0.0460 +/- 0.070 mm) (P < .001). In the mandible, there was no distinction between heavy and moderate smokers, and both had greater MBL than nonsmokers (P < .001). Only 3 of the 646 implants failed; the cumulative survival rate was 99.5%. Overall radiographic success rate was 93.2%. Nonsmokers had a higher radiographic success rate (97.1%) than smokers (87.8%) (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a relationship between MBL and smoking habits. A higher incidence of MBL was found in the smoking group, and this was more pronounced in the maxilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16161745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  7 in total

1.  Tardive Dyskinesia, Oral Parafunction, and Implant-Supported Rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Lumetti; G Ghiacci; G M Macaluso; M Amore; C Galli; E Calciolari; E Manfredi
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-12-06

2.  The Effect of Smoking Behavior on Alveolar Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Clinical Implant Patient.

Authors:  Xicong Zhao; Bin Zhu; Yan Duan; Xin Wang; Dehua Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of marginal bone loss around dental implants in cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. A comparative study.

Authors:  Jazib Nazeer; Rohit Singh; Prerna Suri; C D Mouneshkumar; Shweta Bhardwaj; Md Asad Iqubal
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

4.  Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Luca Savio; Alessandro Bermonds; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2020-12-31

5.  Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Implant Failure Rate in Smokers and Nonsmokers.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Saba Nasreen; Subhash Bandgar; Devleena Bhowmick; Ritesh Vatsa; Priyanka Priyadarshni
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 6.  Smoking and dental implants.

Authors:  V Kasat; R Ladda
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2012-07

Review 7.  Dealing with dental implant failures.

Authors:  Liran Levin
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.