J McCullagh1, G Lewis, C Warlow. 1. Sefton Health Improvement Support Service, Liverpool. jo.mccullagh@southsefton-pct.nhs.uk
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of a health promotion initiative on men's knowledge of testicular cancer and self-examination rates. METHOD: A quasi-experimental, pre- and post-test questionnaire study of men at 14 workplace and leisure sites across two primary care trusts was undertaken: ten experimental sites received the intervention and four acted as a control. Men at all 14 sites were given a pre- and post-test questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 835 pre-test and 835 post-test questionnaires distributed, 518 (62.0 per cent) and 356 (42.6 per cent) were respectively returned for evaluation. In the intervention group, the median total knowledge score increased from three points (interquartile range: 2,4) at baseline to four points (interquartile range: 2,4) at post-test. However, no statistically significant change was observed in the control group. Post-intervention, the percentage of test participants examining their testicles regularly increased from 58.4 per cent to 68.3 per cent, while levels among control peers did not significantly alter. CONCLUSION: This evaluation highlights the potential of using a low-cost initiative which targets innovative venues to improve men's knowledge of testicular cancer and rates of self-examination. Longer-term follow-up may be required to determine whether such increases are sustained.
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of a health promotion initiative on men's knowledge of testicular cancer and self-examination rates. METHOD: A quasi-experimental, pre- and post-test questionnaire study of men at 14 workplace and leisure sites across two primary care trusts was undertaken: ten experimental sites received the intervention and four acted as a control. Men at all 14 sites were given a pre- and post-test questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 835 pre-test and 835 post-test questionnaires distributed, 518 (62.0 per cent) and 356 (42.6 per cent) were respectively returned for evaluation. In the intervention group, the median total knowledge score increased from three points (interquartile range: 2,4) at baseline to four points (interquartile range: 2,4) at post-test. However, no statistically significant change was observed in the control group. Post-intervention, the percentage of test participants examining their testicles regularly increased from 58.4 per cent to 68.3 per cent, while levels among control peers did not significantly alter. CONCLUSION: This evaluation highlights the potential of using a low-cost initiative which targets innovative venues to improve men's knowledge of testicular cancer and rates of self-examination. Longer-term follow-up may be required to determine whether such increases are sustained.
Authors: Deanna Kepka; Julia Bodson; Djin Lai; Ana C Sanchez-Birkhead; France A Davis; Doriena Lee; Fahina Tavake-Pasi; Edwin Napia; Jeannette Villalta; Valentine Mukundente; Ryan Mooney; Heather Coulter; Louisa A Stark Journal: Ethn Health Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Lynn M Robertson; Flora Douglas; Anne Ludbrook; Garth Reid; Edwin van Teijlingen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-07-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: J Austoker; C Bankhead; L J L Forbes; L Atkins; F Martin; K Robb; J Wardle; A J Ramirez Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Susan T Vadaparampil; Richard P Moser; Jennifer Loud; June A Peters; Mark H Greene; Larissa Korde Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 2.857