Literature DB >> 1616080

Patient-controlled analgesia: a double-blind study in burn patients.

M Choiniere1, R Grenier, C Paquette.   

Abstract

A double-blind controlled study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled analgesia in burn patients. This method was compared with conventional analgesic therapy consisting of intermittent intravenous morphine injections. Twenty-four adult patients hospitalised for burn injuries participated in the study. The McGill Pain Questionnaire, visual analogue scales and verbal-numeric scales were administered at regular intervals to measure various components of the patients' pain experience, degree of pain relief, anxiety levels, adverse side effects and overall treatment efficacy. Although statistical significance was found in only one measure, the results suggested better pain control in patients who were administered morphine by patient-controlled analgesia as compared with intermittent injections. Analysis of the side effects showed no difference between the groups. The amount of morphine administered over the trial period was also similar for the two groups but considerable interpatient variability was seen. Although further research is needed to determine the conditions for optimal use of patient-controlled analgesia, it is concluded that it is a safe, effective and improved method for controlling pain in selected burn patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1616080     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02266.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  7 in total

1.  Randomised controlled trial of patient controlled analgesia compared with nurse delivered analgesia in an emergency department.

Authors:  E Evans; N Turley; N Robinson; M Clancy
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  PCA in burn injuries: the subcutaneous route.

Authors:  E A Shipton; H S Minkowitz; P J Becker
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and intramuscular meperidine after thoracotomy.

Authors:  A Boulanger; M Choinière; D Roy; B Bouré; D Chartrand; R Choquette; P Rousseau
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES); a protocol for two open-label randomised trials of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus routine care in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jason E Smith; Mark Rockett; Rosalyn Squire; Christopher J Hayward; Siobhan Creanor; Paul Ewings; Andy Barton; Colin Pritchard; Jonathan Richard Benger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Patient-centred outcomes are under-reported in the critical care burns literature: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karthik Venkatesh; Alice Henschke; Richard P Lee; Anthony Delaney
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)--patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial.

Authors:  Jason E Smith; Mark Rockett; Siobhan Creanor; Rosalyn Squire; Chris Hayward; Paul Ewings; Andy Barton; Colin Pritchard; Victoria Eyre; Laura Cocking; Jonathan Benger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-06-21

7.  PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)--patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial.

Authors:  Jason E Smith; Mark Rockett; Siobhan Creanor S; Rosalyn Squire; Chris Hayward; Paul Ewings; Andy Barton; Colin Pritchard; Victoria Eyre; Laura Cocking; Jonathan Benger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-06-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.