Literature DB >> 16160132

Risk-treatment mismatch in the pharmacotherapy of heart failure.

Douglas S Lee1, Jack V Tu, David N Juurlink, David A Alter, Dennis T Ko, Peter C Austin, Alice Chong, Therese A Stukel, Daniel Levy, Andreas Laupacis.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Patients with heart failure have a wide spectrum of mortality risks. To maximize the benefit of available pharmacotherapies, patients with high mortality risk should receive high rates of drug therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To examine patterns of drug therapy and underlying mortality risk in patients with heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: In the Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment (EFFECT) population-based cohort (1999-2001) of 9942 patients with heart failure hospitalized in Ontario, Canada, we evaluated 1418 patients with documented left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less and aged 79 years or younger with low-, average-, and high-predicted risk of death within 1 year; all patients survived to hospital discharge. Administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists was evaluated according to predicted risk of death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Heart failure drug administration rates at time of discharge and 90 days after hospital discharge.
RESULTS: At hospital discharge, prescription rates for patients in the low-, average-, and high-risk groups were 81%, 73%, 60%, respectively, for ACE inhibitors; 86%, 80%, 65%, respectively, for ACE inhibitors or ARBs; and 40%, 33%, 24%, respectively, for beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists (all P<.001 for trend). Within 90 days following hospital discharge, the rates were 83%, 76%, and 61% for ACE inhibitors; 89%, 83%, and 67% for ACE inhibitors or ARBs; and 43%, 36%, and 28% for beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists for the 3 risk groups, respectively (all P<.001 for trend). The pattern of lower rates of drug administration in those patients at increasing risk was maintained up to 1 year postdischarge (P<.001). After accounting for varying survival time and potential contraindications to therapy, low-risk patients were more likely to receive ACE inhibitors or ARBs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-1.74) and beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists (HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.60-2.01) compared with high-risk patients (both P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with heart failure at greatest risk of death are least likely to receive ACE inhibitors, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, and beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists. Understanding the reasons underlying this mismatch may facilitate improvements in care and outcomes for patients with heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16160132     DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  55 in total

1.  Acute reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction from 1994-2003.

Authors:  Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Martha E Blaney; Susan M Morris; Lori Parsons; Dave P Miller; John G Canto; Hal V Barron; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Thérèse A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; David A Alter; Daniel J Gottlieb; Marian J Vermeulen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Relationship between polypharmacy and underprescribing.

Authors:  Mascha A J Kuijpers; Rob J van Marum; Antoine C G Egberts; Paul A F Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Medication adherence in heart failure.

Authors:  Paul J Hauptman
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Proliferation of prenatal ultrasonography.

Authors:  John J You; David A Alter; Therese A Stukel; Sarah D McDonald; Andreas Laupacis; Ying Liu; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Improving Provider Adherence to Guideline Recommendations in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Katherine E Di Palo; Ileana L Piña; Hector O Ventura
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-12

Review 7.  Cardiac Rehabilitation to Optimize Medication Regimens in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Parag Goyal; Eiran Z Gorodeski; Zachary A Marcum; Daniel E Forman
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.076

8.  Primary ICD-therapy in patients with advanced heart failure: selection strategies and future trials.

Authors:  Lutz Frankenstein; Christian Zugck; Manfred Nelles; Dieter Schellberg; Andrew Remppis; Hugo Katus
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Cholinesterase inhibitors and hospitalization for bradycardia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Laura Y Park-Wyllie; Muhammad M Mamdani; Ping Li; Sudeep S Gill; Andreas Laupacis; David N Juurlink
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Impact of clinical urgency, physician supply and procedural capacity on regional variations in wait times for coronary angiography.

Authors:  Harindra C Wijeysundera; Therese A Stukel; Alice Chong; Madhu K Natarajan; David A Alter
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.