Literature DB >> 16160060

Phenotypic ranges and relationships among carcass and meat palatability traits for fourteen cattle breeds, and heritabilities and expected progeny differences for Warner-Bratzler shear force in three beef cattle breeds.

M E Dikeman1, E J Pollak, Z Zhang, D W Moser, C A Gill, E A Dressler.   

Abstract

Carcass and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) data from strip loin steaks were obtained from 7,179 progeny of Angus, Brahman, Brangus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Hereford, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Red Angus, Salers, Shorthorn, Simbrah, Simmental, and South Devon sires. Trained sensory panel (TSP) evaluations were obtained on 2,320 steaks sampled from contemporary groups of progeny from one to five sires of each breed. Expected progeny differences for marbling and WBSF were developed for 103 Simmental sires from 1,295 progeny, 23 Shorthorn sires from 310 progeny, and 69 Hereford sires from 1,457 progeny. Pooled phenotypic residual correlations, including all progeny, showed that marbling was lowly correlated with WBSF (-0.21) and with TSP overall tenderness (0.18). The residual correlation between WBSF and TSP tenderness was -0.68, whereas residual correlations for progeny sired by the three Bos indicus breeds were only slightly different than for progeny sired by Bos taurus breeds. The phenotypic range of mean WBSF among sires across breeds was 6.27 kg, and the phenotypic range among breed means was 3.93 kg. Heritability estimates for fat thickness, marbling score, WBSF, and TSP tenderness, juiciness, and flavor were 0.19, 0.68, 0.40, 0.37, 0.46, and 0.07, respectively. Ranges in EPD for WBSF and marbling were -0.41 to +0.26 kg and +0.48 to -0.22, respectively, for Simmentals; -0.41 to +0.36 kg and 0.00 to -0.32, respectively, for Shorthorns; and -0.48 to +0.22 kg and +0.40 to -0.24, respectively, for Herefords. More than 20% of steaks were unacceptable in tenderness. Results of this study demonstrated that 1) selection for marbling would result in little improvement in meat tenderness; 2) heritability of marbling, tenderness, and juiciness are high; and 3) sufficient variation exists in WBSF EPD among widely used Simmental, Shorthorn, and Hereford sires to allow for genetic improvement in LM tenderness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16160060     DOI: 10.2527/2005.83102461x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Genetic analysis of carcass and meat quality traits in Nelore cattle1.

Authors:  Daniel Gustavo M Gordo; Rafael Espigolan; Tiago Bresolin; Gerardo A Fernandes Júnior; Ana F B Magalhães; Camila U Braz; Willian Bruno Fernandes; Fernando Baldi; Lucia G Albuquerque
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Phenotypic and genetic correlations of fatty acid composition in subcutaneous adipose tissue with carcass merit and meat tenderness traits in Canadian beef cattle.

Authors:  C Ekine-Dzivenu; M Vinsky; J A Basarab; J L Aalhus; M E R Dugan; C Li
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Candidate Genes Related to Intramuscular Fat Deposition and Fatty Acid Composition in the Breast Muscle of Squabs (Columba).

Authors:  Manhong Ye; Bin Zhou; Shanshan Wei; MengMeng Ding; Xinghui Lu; Xuehao Shi; Jiatong Ding; Shengmei Yang; Wanhong Wei
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Genomic Approaches Reveal Pleiotropic Effects in Crossbred Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Fernanda M Rezende; Eduardo Rodriguez; Joel D Leal-Gutiérrez; Mauricio A Elzo; Dwain D Johnson; Chad Carr; Raluca G Mateescu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Discovery of novel genetic networks associated with 19 economically important traits in beef cattle.

Authors:  Zhihua Jiang; Jennifer J Michal; Jie Chen; Tyler F Daniels; Tanja Kunej; Matthew D Garcia; Charles T Gaskins; Jan R Busboom; Leeson J Alexander; Raymond W Wright; Michael D Macneil
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 6.  Ruminant meat flavor influenced by different factors with special reference to fatty acids.

Authors:  Muhammad Sajid Arshad; Muhammad Sohaib; Rabia Shabir Ahmad; Muhamad Tahir Nadeem; Ali Imran; Muhammad Umair Arshad; Joong-Ho Kwon; Zaid Amjad
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  The Use of Electronic Nose in the Quality Evaluation and Adulteration Identification of Beijing-You Chicken.

Authors:  Jingru Chen; Wenjie Yan; Yu Fu; Liang Wang; Xueze Lv; Ruitong Dai; Xingmin Li; Fei Jia
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.