OBJECTIVE: To characterise patients who appear to fulfil the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved systolic function clinically, echocardiographically, and by concentrations of brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). METHODS: 102 new cases of heart failure were identified over 24 months in 213 patients referred to a rapid access heart failure clinic. Patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function with contemporary markers of diastolic function were assessed to evaluate their cardiac status further. RESULTS: Forty patients (39%) had an ejection fraction (EF) < 45% and 62 (61%) had an EF > or = 45%. Of these 62 patients, 30 (48%) fulfilled the case definition of diastolic heart failure. The remaining 32 (52%) had neither an EF < 45% nor abnormalities of diastolic function. Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed on 26 (42%) patients with EF > or = 45%, which provided an alternative explanation for symptoms in 15 (58%) patients. Concentrations of BNP were higher in patients with diastolic abnormalities (mean (SEM) 101.4 (32.5) pg/ml v 58.4 (6.78) pg/ml, p = 0.042) and with no diastolic abnormalities (199 (37.9) pg/ml v 58.4 (6.78) pg/ml, p < 0.0001) than in patients with no heart failure. CONCLUSION: Among ambulatory patients presenting with suspected heart failure in the community 19% have systolic dysfunction, 14% have diastolic dysfunction, and 15% seemingly have heart failure with neither systolic nor diastolic dysfunction. A new understanding, including alternative parameters of diastolic function, seems to be necessary to classify patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function.
OBJECTIVE: To characterise patients who appear to fulfil the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved systolic function clinically, echocardiographically, and by concentrations of brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). METHODS: 102 new cases of heart failure were identified over 24 months in 213 patients referred to a rapid access heart failure clinic. Patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function with contemporary markers of diastolic function were assessed to evaluate their cardiac status further. RESULTS: Forty patients (39%) had an ejection fraction (EF) < 45% and 62 (61%) had an EF > or = 45%. Of these 62 patients, 30 (48%) fulfilled the case definition of diastolic heart failure. The remaining 32 (52%) had neither an EF < 45% nor abnormalities of diastolic function. Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed on 26 (42%) patients with EF > or = 45%, which provided an alternative explanation for symptoms in 15 (58%) patients. Concentrations of BNP were higher in patients with diastolic abnormalities (mean (SEM) 101.4 (32.5) pg/ml v 58.4 (6.78) pg/ml, p = 0.042) and with no diastolic abnormalities (199 (37.9) pg/ml v 58.4 (6.78) pg/ml, p < 0.0001) than in patients with no heart failure. CONCLUSION: Among ambulatory patients presenting with suspected heart failure in the community 19% have systolic dysfunction, 14% have diastolic dysfunction, and 15% seemingly have heart failure with neither systolic nor diastolic dysfunction. A new understanding, including alternative parameters of diastolic function, seems to be necessary to classify patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function.
Authors: A S Maisel; J Koon; P Krishnaswamy; R Kazenegra; P Clopton; N Gardetto; R Morrisey; A Garcia; A Chiu; A De Maria Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: K F Fox; M R Cowie; D A Wood; A J Coats; J S Gibbs; S R Underwood; R M Turner; P A Poole-Wilson; S W Davies; G C Sutton Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Q Dao; P Krishnaswamy; R Kazanegra; A Harrison; R Amirnovin; L Lenert; P Clopton; J Alberto; P Hlavin; A S Maisel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Barry A Borlaug; Rick A Nishimura; Paul Sorajja; Carolyn S P Lam; Margaret M Redfield Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Beshay N Zordoky; Miranda M Sung; Justin Ezekowitz; Rupasri Mandal; Beomsoo Han; Trent C Bjorndahl; Souhaila Bouatra; Todd Anderson; Gavin Y Oudit; David S Wishart; Jason R B Dyck Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 3.240