Literature DB >> 1615990

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: are there useful and valid predictors of success or failure?

M G Pickhardt1, J N Martin, E F Meydrech, P G Blake, R W Martin, K G Perry, J C Morrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Before parturition are there useful and valid predictors of successful or unsuccessful vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth that could be used to enhance the obstetric care of a patient and her pregnancy? STUDY
DESIGN: The clinical course and outcome of all patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at one level III center during 1989 were evaluated to identify factors prognostic of a successful or unsuccessful patient group; use of this information in stepwise logistic regression and cluster analysis was disappointing.
RESULTS: No single criterion or optimal clusters of factors were found and no equation achieved greater than 75% predictability of outcome with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: Before parturition prediction of outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery is tenuous regardless of past obstetric history or recent clinical parameters. Thus it seems appropriate to encourage a trial of labor in almost all patients with a prior low-segment uterine incision (transverse or vertical) unless there is a strong physician or patient-derived contraindication to such an undertaking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1615990     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91572-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  How do good candidates for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who undergo elective repeat cesarean differ from those who choose TOLAC?

Authors:  Torri D Metz; Gregory J Stoddard; Erick Henry; Marc Jackson; Calla Holmgren; Sean Esplin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission.

Authors:  Torri D Metz; Gregory J Stoddard; Erick Henry; Marc Jackson; Calla Holmgren; Sean Esplin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section and outcomes in rural area of Anatolia.

Authors:  Mehmet Baki Senturk; Yusuf Cakmak; Halit Atac; Mehmet Sukru Budak
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-07-10

4.  Intrapartum cesarean delivery in nulliparas: risk factors compared by two analytical approaches.

Authors:  M A Kominiarek; P VanVeldhuisen; K Gregory; M Fridman; H Kim; J U Hibbard
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Predictive modeling of emergency cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Carlos Campillo-Artero; Miquel Serra-Burriel; Andrés Calvo-Pérez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development of a Modified Score System as Prediction Model for Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Yan-Ping Xing; Xin-Ying Qi; Xue-Zhen Wang; Feng-Zhen Yang
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  The effect of the use of a decision aid with individual risk estimation on the mode of delivery after a caesarean section: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emy Vankan; Ellen Schoorel; Sander van Kuijk; Jan Nijhuis; Rosella Hermens; Hubertina Scheepers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Vidyadhar B Bangal; Purushottam A Giri; Kunaal K Shinde; Satyajit P Gavhane
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02

9.  Validation of a Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model in Teaching Hospitals of Addis Ababa University: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Eyaya Misgan; Abel Gedefaw; Shiferaw Negash; Anteneh Asefa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.