BACKGROUND: Although animal studies showed that annular remodeling may be related to the pathogenesis of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (CIMR), little was known in humans. A better understanding of the precise 3D geometry of the mitral valvular-ventricular complex in CIMR is needed to devise a better surgical technique. The purpose of the study was to elucidate mitral annular geometry in patients with CIMR using cardiac MRI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with previous inferior or posterior myocardial infarction were studied. With the 3D reconstruction of the mitral annulus and subvalvular apparatus from a series of longitudinal cine MRIs, end-systolic mitral annulus dimensions and 3D geometry were calculated. Patients were grouped by mitral regurgitation grade using echocardiography (> or =2+, n=15 versus < or =1+, n=23). Both septal-lateral and commissure-commissure mitral annular diameters were significantly greater in CIMR(+) patients (35+/-5 versus 30+/-4 mm, P=0.005; 46+/-6 versus 39+/-4 mm, P<0.001, respectively). The length of the fibrous annulus was significantly larger in CIMR(+) patients (28+/-3 versus 24+/-3 mm; P<0.001). The height of the annular "saddle horn" above a best-fit plane was lower in CIMR(+) patients (4.2+/-1.2 versus 6.0+/-1.8 mm; P=0.002), and the annular height to commissural width ratio was significantly lower in CIMR(+) patients (12+/-3 versus 21+/-5%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CIMR had greater septal-lateral and commissure-commissure mitral annular dimension, larger intertrigonal distance, and flattened saddle shape of mitral annulus. These associated geometric alterations may be important in the pathogenesis of CIMR.
BACKGROUND: Although animal studies showed that annular remodeling may be related to the pathogenesis of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (CIMR), little was known in humans. A better understanding of the precise 3D geometry of the mitral valvular-ventricular complex in CIMR is needed to devise a better surgical technique. The purpose of the study was to elucidate mitral annular geometry in patients with CIMR using cardiac MRI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with previous inferior or posterior myocardial infarction were studied. With the 3D reconstruction of the mitral annulus and subvalvular apparatus from a series of longitudinal cine MRIs, end-systolic mitral annulus dimensions and 3D geometry were calculated. Patients were grouped by mitral regurgitation grade using echocardiography (> or =2+, n=15 versus < or =1+, n=23). Both septal-lateral and commissure-commissure mitral annular diameters were significantly greater in CIMR(+) patients (35+/-5 versus 30+/-4 mm, P=0.005; 46+/-6 versus 39+/-4 mm, P<0.001, respectively). The length of the fibrous annulus was significantly larger in CIMR(+) patients (28+/-3 versus 24+/-3 mm; P<0.001). The height of the annular "saddle horn" above a best-fit plane was lower in CIMR(+) patients (4.2+/-1.2 versus 6.0+/-1.8 mm; P=0.002), and the annular height to commissural width ratio was significantly lower in CIMR(+) patients (12+/-3 versus 21+/-5%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with CIMR had greater septal-lateral and commissure-commissure mitral annular dimension, larger intertrigonal distance, and flattened saddle shape of mitral annulus. These associated geometric alterations may be important in the pathogenesis of CIMR.
Authors: Ashraf M Anwar; Osama I I Soliman; Folkert J ten Cate; Attila Nemes; Jackie S McGhie; Boudewijn J Krenning; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Tjebbe W Galema; Marcel L Geleijnse Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: B Graser; D Wald; S Al-Maisary; M Grossgasteiger; R de Simone; H-P Meinzer; I Wolf Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Tom C Nguyen; Akinobu Itoh; Carl J Carlhäll; Wolfgang Bothe; Tomasz A Timek; Daniel B Ennis; Robert A Oakes; David Liang; George T Daughters; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Robert J Schneider; Douglas P Perrin; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Gerald R Marx; Pedro J del Nido; Robert D Howe Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2011-12-04 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: June-Hong Kim; Ozgur Kocaturk; Cengizhan Ozturk; Anthony Z Faranesh; Merdim Sonmez; Smita Sampath; Christina E Saikus; Ann H Kim; Venkatesh K Raman; J Andrew Derbyshire; William H Schenke; Victor J Wright; Colin Berry; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert J Schneider; Douglas P Perrin; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Gerald R Marx; Pedro J del Nido; Robert D Howe Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Feroze Mahmood; Balachundhar Subramaniam; Joseph H Gorman; Robert M Levine; Robert C Gorman; Andrew Maslow; Peter J Panzica; Robert M Hagberg; Swaminathan Karthik; Kamal R Khabbaz Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Philipp Kahlert; Björn Plicht; Rolf Alexander Jánosi; Markus Kamler; Hilmar Kühl; Holger Eggebrecht; Stefan Sack; Thomas Buck; Thomas Konorza; Raimund Erbel Journal: Herz Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 1.443