Literature DB >> 16159843

Early outcome of a randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularization.

Junjiro Kobayashi1, Tadashi Tashiro, Masami Ochi, Hitoshi Yaku, Go Watanabe, Toshihiko Satoh, Osamu Tagusari, Hiroyuki Nakajima, Soichiro Kitamura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous randomized comparisons of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have yielded controversial results about the cardiac and neurological events and graft patency. In addition, these randomized studies were composed of CABG with a few arterial grafts. We performed a prospective randomized controlled study to compare off-pump and on-pump CABG with multiple arterial grafts. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between July, 2002, and September, 2004, 167 consecutive unselected patients referred for elective primary CABG were randomly assigned to undergo multiple arterial off-pump CABG (n=81) or on-pump CABG (n=86). The clinical outcomes and S-100 protein, neuron-specific enolase, and maximum creatine kinase-MB levels were compared. Early graft patency was examined within 3 weeks after the operation by angiography. The number of grafts performed per patient (3.5+/-1.0 for off-pump CABG and 3.6+/-0.9 for on-pump CABG) and the number of arterial grafts performed per patient (3.3+/-1.0 for off-pump CABG and 3.4+/-0.9 for on-pump CABG) were similar. Completeness of revascularization (completed grafts/planned grafts) was 98% in both procedures. There were no hospital deaths in either group. The operation time was significantly (P<0.001) shorter in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (267+/-60 minutes versus 307+/-59 minutes). The incidence of perioperative complications was similar. The frequency of no need for transfusion was higher in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (80% versus 55%, P<0.001). The S-100 protein levels at the admission into the intensive care unit were significantly (P<0.001) lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (0.20+/-0.11 ng/mL versus 0.34+/-0.22 ng/mL). The neuron-specific enolase levels at the intensive care unit admission were significantly (P<0.001) lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (10.4+/-9.0 ng/mL versus 16.9+/-6.9 ng/mL). Maximum creatine kinase-MB levels were significantly (P=0.046) lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (17.1+/-16.7 IU/L versus 21.5+/-10.6 IU/L). The overall early graft patency rate with or without stenosis was the same (98%) in both groups, but the rate without stenosis was slightly worse in the off-pump group (93%) than in the on-pump group (96%) (P=0.093). The stenosis-free patency rate in the right coronary area was significantly (P=0.028) worse in the off-pump CABG group (90%) than in the on-pump group (99%).
CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump CABG with multiple arterial grafts was as safe as the conventional on-pump CABG, with similar completeness of revascularization and early graft patency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16159843     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.524504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  22 in total

Review 1.  Advances in surgical treatment of acute and chronic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  William E Cohn
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

Review 2.  A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Rong Chu; Richard Whitlock; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  The effect of preoperative aspirin administration on postoperative level of von Willebrand factor in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Kaoru Matsuura; Mizuho Imamaki; Atsushi Ishida; Hitoshi Shimura; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass: techniques, pitfalls, and results.

Authors:  Tadashi Tashiro; Hideichi Wada; Masaru Nishimi; Noritoshi Minematsu
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-18

5.  Comparison of Mid-Term Graft Patency between On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Tatsuya Seki; Toshihito Yoshida
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 1.520

6.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Victor F Seabra; Sami Alobaidi; Ethan M Balk; Alan H Poon; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 7.  [Cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery].

Authors:  T Baehner; O Boehm; C Probst; B Poetzsch; A Hoeft; G Baumgarten; P Knuefermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Incidence of atrial fibrillation after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and propensity score matching trials.

Authors:  Chuang-Yan Wu; Si-Hua Wang; Yu-Qiang Shang; Jia-Hong Xia
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-21

9.  Heart Rate Variability after Off-Pump versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Nenad Lakusic; Valentina Slivnjak; Franjo Baborski; Dusko Cerovec
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 10.  Strategies to prevent intraoperative lung injury during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Efstratios E Apostolakis; Efstratios N Koletsis; Nikolaos G Baikoussis; Stavros N Siminelakis; Georgios S Papadopoulos
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.