Literature DB >> 16159826

Decade of aortic valve sparing reimplantation: are we pushing the limits too far?

Klaus Kallenbach1, Matthias Karck, Dorota Pak, Rolf Salcher, Nawid Khaladj, Rainer Leyh, Christian Hagl, Axel Haverich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This single center study assesses the outcome of aortic valve sparing reimplantation (AVS) in 284 consecutive patients who were operated on for various indications during the last 11 years. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From July, 1993, to July, 2004, 284 patients underwent AVS. Mean age was 53+/-16 (range 8 to 84) years. Of the 284 patients, 184 were male (64.8%) and 54 (19%) experienced Marfan's syndrome. Acute aortic dissection Stanford type A was present in 53 patients (19%) and a bicuspid aortic valve was present in 17 patients (6%). Concomitant arch replacement was necessary in 120 patients (42%). Additional procedures were performed in 66 patients (23.2%). Mean follow-up time was 41+/-32 (range 0 to 130) months. The 30-day mortality was 3.2% overall, 11.3% in emergency patients, and 1.3% in elective patients. Mean bypass time was 174+/-48 (range 90 to 440) minutes and aortic cross clamp time was 132+/-33 (range 64 to 283) minutes. In patients undergoing arch replacement, circulatory arrest was 25+/-17 (range 7 to 99) minutes. Rethoracotomy for bleeding was required in 4.6% of patients. During follow-up, there were 20 (7.3%) late deaths. Reoperation of the reconstructed valve was required in 15 patients (5.3%); underlying reasons were endocarditis (n=4) and aortic insufficiency (n=11) requiring aortic valve replacement. Average grade of aortic insufficiency increased significantly from 0.23+/-0.46 postoperatively to 0.34+/-0.59 at latest evaluation (P=0.026). Two patients experienced a transient ischemic attack early postoperatively; no further thromboembolic complications were noticed. The majority of patients (96%) presented with a favorable exercise tolerance at last contact.
CONCLUSIONS: The aortic valve reimplantation technique leads to excellent clinical outcome in patients with various pathologies. Lack of anticoagulation and favorable durability should encourage the extension of indications for this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16159826     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIRCULATIONAHA.104.525907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  Long-term results after aortic valve-sparing operation (David I).

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Hassina Baraki; Ilona Maeding; Sebastian Fitzner; Samir Sarikouch; Nawid Khaladj; Christian Hagl; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Minimally invasive valve sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure) is safe.

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Heike Krueger; Julia Umminger; Nurbol Koigeldiyev; Erik Beckmann; Axel Haverich; Andreas Martens
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Dilation of the thoracic aorta: medical and surgical management.

Authors:  P Nataf; E Lansac
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Simulation of the fluid dynamics in artificial aortic roots: comparison of two different types of prostheses.

Authors:  Christoph L Bara; Janko F Verhey
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  Bicuspidy does not affect reoperation risk following aortic valve reimplantation.

Authors:  Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Alessio Basciu; Enrico Citterio; Antioco Cappai; Diego Ornaghi; Giuseppe Tarelli; Fabrizio Settepani
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-02

Review 6.  [Modern aortic surgery in Marfan syndrome--2011].

Authors:  K Kallenbach; S Schwill; M Karck
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  [Thoracic aortic surgery with circulatory arrest and cold cerebral perfusion].

Authors:  N Khaladj; C Hagl; M Shrestha; S Peterss; M Winterhalter; L Hoy; M Pichlmaier; A Haverich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  Overview of current surgical strategies for aortic disease in patients with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Shunsuke Miyahara; Yutaka Okita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Systematic review of aortic valve preservation and repair.

Authors:  Richard Saczkowski; Tarek Malas; Laurent de Kerchove; Gebrine El Khoury; Munir Boodhwani
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

10.  Surgical Treatment of Annuloaortic Ectasia - Replace or Repair?

Authors:  Andrea De Martino; Federico Del Re; Stefania Blasi; Michele Celiento; Giacomo Ravenni; Stefano Pratali; Aldo D Milano; Uberto Bortolotti
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2017-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.