Literature DB >> 16159692

Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.

Stig Steen1, Trygve Sjöberg, Paul Olsson, Marie Young.   

Abstract

Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) is a new gas-driven CPR device providing automatic chest compression and active decompression. This is a report of the first 100 consecutive cases treated with LUCAS due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (58% asystole, 42% ventricular fibrillation (VF)). Safety aspects were also investigated and it was found that LUCAS can be used safely regarding noise levels and oxygen concentrations within the ambulance. A crash test (10G) showed no displacement of the device from the manikin. Of the 71 patients with witnessed cardiac arrest, 39% received bystander CPR. In those 28 patients where LUCAS-CPR was initiated more than 15 min after the ambulance alarm and in the 29 unwitnessed cases, none survived for 30 days. Of the 43 witnessed cases treated with LUCAS within 15 min, 24 had VF and 15 (63%) of these cases achieved a stable return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 6 (25%) of them survived with a good neurological recovery after 30 days; 5 (26%) of the 19 patients with asystole achieved ROSC and 1 (5%) survived for over 30 days. One patient where ROSC could not be achieved was transported with on-going LUCAS-CPR to the catheter laboratory and after PCI for an occluded LAD a stable ROSC occurred, but the patient never regained consciousness and died 15 days later. To conclude, establishment of an adequate cerebral circulation as quickly as possible after cardiac arrest is mandatory for a good outcome. In this report patients with a witnessed cardiac arrest receiving LUCAS-CPR within 15 min from the ambulance call had a 30-day survival of 25% in VF and 5% in asystole, but if the interval was more than 15 min, there were no 30-day survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16159692     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  16 in total

1.  [Successful resuscitation after cardiac arrest using a precordial thump.].

Authors:  J Küstermann; A Tannert; N Roewer; R M Muellenbach
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Use of the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System in the MD902: a fire safety assessment.

Authors:  J S Farmery; M Carter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  [The new 2005 resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council: comments and supplements].

Authors:  V Wenzel; S Russo; H R Arntz; J Bahr; M A Baubin; B W Böttiger; B Dirks; V Dörges; C Eich; M Fischer; B Wolcke; S Schwab; W G Voelckel; H W Gervais
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Comments on the 2010 guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the European Resuscitation Council].

Authors:  V Wenzel; S G Russo; H R Arntz; J Bahr; M A Baubin; B W Böttiger; B Dirks; U Kreimeier; M Fries; C Eich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Emergency medicine, organ donation and the Human Tissue Act.

Authors:  M D D Bell
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Peter L Wang; Steven C Brooks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-20

Review 7.  Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Diana M Cave; Raul J Gazmuri; Charles W Otto; Vinay M Nadkarni; Adam Cheng; Steven C Brooks; Mohamud Daya; Robert M Sutton; Richard Branson; Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Computed tomography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using automated chest compression devices--an initial study.

Authors:  Stefan Wirth; Markus Körner; Marcus Treitl; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Bernd A Leidel; Thomas Jaschkowitz; Maximilian F Reiser; Karl G Kanz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Use of the LUCAS mechanical chest compression device for percutaneous coronary intervention during cardiac arrest: is it really a game changer?

Authors:  G Biondi-Zoccai; G Landoni; A Zangrillo; P Agostoni; G Sangiorgi; M G Modena
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2011

10.  Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  Qiuming Liao; Trygve Sjöberg; Audrius Paskevicius; Björn Wohlfart; Stig Steen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.