OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a simvastatin-to-lovastatin therapeutic conversion program. STUDY DESIGN: Observational database study of a therapeutic conversion in members of the Northern and Southern California regions of Kaiser Permanente, using a pretest/posttest design. METHODS: All patients actively converted from simvastatin to lovastatin between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2003, were identified for inclusion in the analysis. The conversion from simvastatin to lovastatin was based on an equipotent dose ratio of 1 mg of simvastatin to 2 mg of lovastatin. Electronic prescription record and laboratory data were collected for converted patients beginning 365 days before changing therapy through June 30, 2003. The primary effectiveness end point was a comparison of the preconversion and postconversion low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Safety end points included an analysis of preconversion and postconversion alanine aminotransferase (ALT) tests and creatine kinase values. RESULTS: A total of 33,318 converted patients met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The mean LDL-C was lowered from 110.9 to 108.4 mg/dL (P < .001) following the conversion to lovastatin. The percentage of patients with serum ALT levels greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) was similar before (0.7%) and after (0.6%) conversion from simvastatin to lovastatin. Creatine kinase elevations greater then 10 times the ULN occurred at similar rates before and after the conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients had an improvement in their lipid profile without evidence of hepatic or muscle enzyme elevations. Appropriately selected patients can be safely and effectively converted from simvastatin to lovastatin.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a simvastatin-to-lovastatin therapeutic conversion program. STUDY DESIGN: Observational database study of a therapeutic conversion in members of the Northern and Southern California regions of Kaiser Permanente, using a pretest/posttest design. METHODS: All patients actively converted from simvastatin to lovastatin between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2003, were identified for inclusion in the analysis. The conversion from simvastatin to lovastatin was based on an equipotent dose ratio of 1 mg of simvastatin to 2 mg of lovastatin. Electronic prescription record and laboratory data were collected for converted patients beginning 365 days before changing therapy through June 30, 2003. The primary effectiveness end point was a comparison of the preconversion and postconversion low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Safety end points included an analysis of preconversion and postconversion alanine aminotransferase (ALT) tests and creatine kinase values. RESULTS: A total of 33,318 converted patients met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The mean LDL-C was lowered from 110.9 to 108.4 mg/dL (P < .001) following the conversion to lovastatin. The percentage of patients with serum ALT levels greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) was similar before (0.7%) and after (0.6%) conversion from simvastatin to lovastatin. Creatine kinase elevations greater then 10 times the ULN occurred at similar rates before and after the conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients had an improvement in their lipid profile without evidence of hepatic or muscle enzyme elevations. Appropriately selected patients can be safely and effectively converted from simvastatin to lovastatin.
Authors: O Kenrik Duru; Susan L Ettner; Norman Turk; Carol M Mangione; Arleen F Brown; Jeffery Fu; Leslie Simien; Chien-Wen Tseng Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Vicki Fung; Mary Reed; Mary Price; Richard Brand; William H Dow; Joseph P Newhouse; John Hsu Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Erin R Weeda; Elaine Nguyen; Silas Martin; Michael Ingham; Diana M Sobieraj; Brahim K Bookhart; Craig I Coleman Journal: J Mark Access Health Policy Date: 2019-10-19
Authors: Adam Wright; Elizabeth A McGlinchey; Eric G Poon; Chelsea A Jenter; David W Bates; Steven R Simon Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Daniel Fife; M Soledad Cepeda; Alan Baseman; Henry Richards; Peter Hu; H Lynn Starr; Anthony G Sena Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240