BACKGROUND: It has been indicated that altered expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) promotes the invasive and metastatic potential of a variety of human malignancies. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine EGFR expression in clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC) to evaluate its prognostic relevance for the clinical course of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EGFR protein expression, detected by immunohistochemistry and tissue microarray analysis (TMA), was investigated in a cohort of 149 randomly selected patients subjected to tumor nephrectomy for RCC. RESULTS: The tumor cells preferably exhibited a homogeneous membrane-bound reactivity for EGFR; EGFR overexpression was detected in 70 (47%) of the primary tumor specimens, but in only 12 (9%) of the benign tissue samples (p<0.0001; Fisher's t-test). Tumor-associated EGFR staining was stratified into three groups: I: low staining score (n=75, 50%); II: intense expression (n=56, 38%); and III: strong overexpression (n = 18, 12%). Strong reactivity for EGFR was identified as predicting the patients' survival both during uni- and multivariate analysis (p=0.03). Interestingly, the overall survival of the intense expression group surpassed even the low expression group (p=0.023). CONCLUSION: The observation that primary RCC specimens exhibit EGFR at higher levels when compared with benign renal parenchyma indicates its role in tumor development and progression. The availability of more refined prognostic factors would assist decision making in terms of the value of more aggressive treatment options for prognostically defined subgroups of patients. Additionally, if overexpression of EGFR identifies RCC with a more aggressive biological behavior, the latter receptor might serve as a novel target for a more effective therapeutical approach to RCC.
BACKGROUND: It has been indicated that altered expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) promotes the invasive and metastatic potential of a variety of humanmalignancies. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine EGFR expression in clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC) to evaluate its prognostic relevance for the clinical course of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS:EGFR protein expression, detected by immunohistochemistry and tissue microarray analysis (TMA), was investigated in a cohort of 149 randomly selected patients subjected to tumor nephrectomy for RCC. RESULTS: The tumor cells preferably exhibited a homogeneous membrane-bound reactivity for EGFR; EGFR overexpression was detected in 70 (47%) of the primary tumor specimens, but in only 12 (9%) of the benign tissue samples (p<0.0001; Fisher's t-test). Tumor-associated EGFR staining was stratified into three groups: I: low staining score (n=75, 50%); II: intense expression (n=56, 38%); and III: strong overexpression (n = 18, 12%). Strong reactivity for EGFR was identified as predicting the patients' survival both during uni- and multivariate analysis (p=0.03). Interestingly, the overall survival of the intense expression group surpassed even the low expression group (p=0.023). CONCLUSION: The observation that primary RCC specimens exhibit EGFR at higher levels when compared with benign renal parenchyma indicates its role in tumor development and progression. The availability of more refined prognostic factors would assist decision making in terms of the value of more aggressive treatment options for prognostically defined subgroups of patients. Additionally, if overexpression of EGFR identifies RCC with a more aggressive biological behavior, the latter receptor might serve as a novel target for a more effective therapeutical approach to RCC.
Authors: Giuseppe Giaccone; Renee B Iacona; Abderrahim Fandi; Mette Janas; Judith S Ochs; Roy S Herbst; David H Johnson Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-12 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Axel S Merseburger; Mario W Kramer; Jörg Hennenlotter; Jürgen Serth; Stephan Kruck; Alfredo Gracia; Arnulf Stenzl; Markus A Kuczyk Journal: World J Urol Date: 2008-07-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: R Kuefer; M Autenrieth; K Herkommer; P Blum; A Merseburger; M Hofer; L Rinnab; J Gschwend; M Ringhoffer Journal: Urologe A Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: K Matušan-Ilijaš; G Damante; D Fabbro; G Dorđević; I Hadžisejdić; M Grahovac; M Avirović; B Grahovac; N Jonjić; K Lučin Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Paolo Cossu-Rocca; Maria R Muroni; Francesca Sanges; Giovanni Sotgiu; Anna Asunis; Luciana Tanca; Daniela Onnis; Giovanna Pira; Alessandra Manca; Simone Dore; Maria G Uras; Sara Ena; Maria R De Miglio Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 6.166