Induction of coronary artery spasm by intracoronary acetylcholine: comparison with intracoronary ergonovine.

To investigate the mechanism of coronary spasm, we compared the action of acetylcholine with that of ergonovine in 11 patients with vasospastic angina (group 1) and in 15 patients with chest pain (group 2). Coronary arteriography was performed immediately after the patients received intracoronary injections of titrated increments of each agent. In the patients in group 1 occlusive or near-occlusive (99% luminal narrowing) coronary spasm associated with angina and ischemic electrocardiographic ST changes was noted in nine of 11 patients receiving acetylcholine and in all 11 patients receiving ergonovine. The region and the degree of the most severe coronary spasm on coronary arteriograms evoked by the two agents were the same in nine of the 11 patients in group 1. In the other two patients in group 1, spontaneous focal coronary spastic stenosis in the baseline coronary arteriogram was relieved by the intracoronary injection of acetylcholine, and a focal coronary occlusive spasm in the same region was induced repeatedly by the subsequent intracoronary injection of ergonovine (paradoxic phenomenon). In contrast, occlusive or near-occlusive coronary spasm was not induced by either agent in any patient in group 2. These results suggest that the two provocative tests for coronary spasm that involve acetylcholine and ergonovine are clinically useful in the diagnosis of vasospastic angina, but testing with intracoronary ergonovine is needed when a spontaneous focal coronary spasm is relieved by the intracoronary injection of acetylcholine. The results also indicate that in many patients with vasospastic angina, nonspecific hypersensitivity to acetylcholine or ergonovine in a definite region of the coronary arteries generally plays an important role in the induction of coronary spasm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)