Literature DB >> 16158030

Factors associated with mortality in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: results from the ACSRS Study.

S K Kakkos1, A Nicolaides, M Griffin, M Sabetai, S Dhanjil, D J Thomas, T Sonecha, A M Salmasi, G Geroulakos, N Georgiou, S Francis, E Ioannidou, C J Dore.   

Abstract

AIM: This study determines the factors associated with mortality in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
METHODS: Patients (n=1,101) with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 50% in relation to the bulb diameter were followed up for a period of 6 to 84 (median 38) months. Stenosis was graded using duplex scanning and expressed as a percentage of the carotid bulb diameter. Clinical and biochemical risk factors were recorded. The end-points were ipsilateral ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death and all cause mortality.
RESULTS: In a Cox multivariate analysis 6 factors emerged as independent predictors of risk. Age, male gender, cardiac failure, left ventricular hypertrophy on electrocardiogram (ECG) and myocardial ischemia on ECG were associated with increased risk. Antiplatelet therapy was associated with decreased risk. Based on these risk factors a high-risk group consisting of one third of the population with a 40% cumulative cardiovascular death rate and a 66% all cause death rate at 7 years could be identified. The remaining 2/3 consisted of a low-risk group with a 10% cumulative cardiovascular death rate and a 21% all cause death rate at 7 years (P<0.0001 compared to the high risk group). There was not any significant difference in the cumulative ipsilateral stroke rate, which was 12% in the low and 13% in the high cardiovascular risk group (Log Rank P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The methodology and findings from the ACSRS natural history study need to be applied to randomized controlled trials on the value of carotid endarterectomy or stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. They may help refine the indications for intervention in patients with carotid endarterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16158030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Angiol        ISSN: 0392-9590            Impact factor:   2.789


  8 in total

1.  Manual therapy and cervical arterial dysfunction, directions for the future: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Roger Kerry; Alan J Taylor; Jeanette Mitchell; Chris McCarthy; John Brew
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

2.  Comparison of carotid endarterectomy and stenting in real world practice using a regional quality improvement registry.

Authors:  Brian W Nolan; Randall R De Martino; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; David H Stone; David Butzel; Christopher J Kwolek; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis: an obsolete classification?

Authors:  Anastasios Chatzikonstantinou; Marc E Wolf; Anke Schaefer; Michael G Hennerici
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-23

4.  Future stroke risk in the chronic phase of post-percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Shinsuke Muraoka; Daiki Somiya; Aoi Ebata; Yuki Kumagai; Naoki Koketsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Chambers; Neil G Roberts
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-04

Review 6.  Using risk models to improve patient selection for high-risk vascular surgery.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-13

Review 7.  Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Stroke (ACSRS) study: what have we learned from it?

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Andrew N Nicolaides; Stavros K Kakkos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

Review 8.  The conundrum of asymptomatic carotid stenosis-determinants of decision and evidence.

Authors:  José Fernandes E Fernandes; Luis Mendes Pedro; Isabel Gonçalves
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.