Literature DB >> 16157143

Is fetal gender associated with adverse perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)?

Joanne N Quiñones1, David M Stamilio, Kara M Coassolo, George A Macones, Anthony O Odibo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in perinatal outcome by gender among growth-restricted fetuses. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) singleton pregnancies over a 5-year period. Clinical outcomes compared by gender included preterm delivery, perinatal mortality (PNM), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Statistical analysis included bivariate and multivariable techniques.
RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-seven singleton pregnancies with IUGR were identified. Three hundred and forty-six (47.6%) were males. Birth weight was similar between the groups. After adjusting for maternal demographics, medical history, gestational age, mode of delivery, and antenatal corticosteroids, adverse perinatal outcomes were similar between the groups. Severity of outcomes was also similar between males and females (P = .66).
CONCLUSION: Male fetuses with IUGR have similar outcomes when compared with female IUGR fetuses. Gender does not play a role in perinatal outcome in the setting of fetal growth restriction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16157143     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Birth weight- and fetal weight-growth restriction: impact on neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Iris G Streimish; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Elizabeth N Allred; T Michael O'Shea; Karl C K Kuban; Nigel Paneth; Alan Leviton
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  INSL3 in the ruminant: a powerful indicator of gender- and genetic-specific feto-maternal dialogue.

Authors:  Ravinder Anand-Ivell; Stefan Hiendleder; Carolina Viñoles; Graeme B Martin; Carolyn Fitzsimmons; Andrea Eurich; Bettina Hafen; Richard Ivell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Effects of antenatal glucocorticoids on the developing brain.

Authors:  Ross Carson; A Paula Monaghan-Nichols; Donald B DeFranco; Anthony C Rudine
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  Association between fetal sex, birthweight percentile and adverse pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Bart Jan Voskamp; Myrthe J C S Peelen; Anita C J Ravelli; Robin van der Lee; Ben W J Mol; Eva Pajkrt; Wessel Ganzevoort; Brenda M Kazemier
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  The importance of fetal gender in intrauterine growth restriction.

Authors:  L Radulescu; D Ferechide; F Popa
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2013-03-25

6.  Birth weight ratio as an alternative to birth weight percentile to express infant weight in research and clinical practice: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Bart Jan Voskamp; Brenda M Kazemier; Ewoud Schuit; Ben Willem J Mol; Maarten Buimer; Eva Pajkrt; Wessel Ganzevoort
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-08-13

7.  Fetal sex and maternal pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zoe A Broere-Brown; Maria C Adank; Laura Benschop; Myrte Tielemans; Taulant Muka; Romy Gonçalves; Wichor M Bramer; Josje D Schoufour; Trudy Voortman; Eric A P Steegers; Oscar H Franco; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.027

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.