Literature DB >> 16156732

Grazing resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms depends on type of protective mechanism, developmental stage and protozoan feeding mode.

Markus Weitere1, Tanja Bergfeld, Scott A Rice, Carsten Matz, Staffan Kjelleberg.   

Abstract

In a previous study we identified microcolony formation and inhibitor production as the major protective mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms against flagellate grazing. Here we compared the efficacy of these two key protective mechanisms by exposing biofilms of the non-toxic alginate overproducing strain PDO300 and the wild-type toxic strain PAO1 to a range of feeding types commonly found in the succession of protozoans associated with natural biofilms. Alginate-mediated microcolony formation conferred effective protection for strain PDO300 against the suspension feeding flagellate Bodo saltans and, as reported earlier, the surface feeding flagellate Rhynchomonas nasuta, both of which are considered as early biofilm colonizers. However, microcolonies of mature PDO300 biofilms were highly susceptible to late biofilm colonizers, the surface-feeding amoeba Acanthamoeba polyphaga and the planktonic ciliate Tetrahymena sp., resulting in a significant reduction of biofilm biomass. Mature biofilms of strain PAO1 inhibited growth of flagellates and A. polyphaga while the grazing activity of Tetrahymena sp. remained unaffected. Our findings suggest that inhibitor production of mature P. aeruginosa biofilms is effective against a wider range of biofilm-feeding predators while microcolony-mediated protection is only beneficial in the early stages of biofilm formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156732     DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00851.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  39 in total

1.  Seasonal and successional influences on bacterial community composition exceed that of protozoan grazing in river biofilms.

Authors:  Jennifer K Wey; Klaus Jürgens; Markus Weitere
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effects of bacterial prey species and their concentration on growth of the amoebae Acanthamoeba castellanii and Hartmannella vermiformis.

Authors:  Zoë L Pickup; Roger Pickup; Jacqueline D Parry
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Responses of biofilm-dwelling ciliate communities to planktonic and benthic resource enrichment.

Authors:  Helge Norf; Hartmut Arndt; Markus Weitere
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Diversity of protists and bacteria determines predation performance and stability.

Authors:  Muhammad Saleem; Ingo Fetzer; Hauke Harms; Antonis Chatzinotas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Predator richness increases the effect of prey diversity on prey yield.

Authors:  Muhammad Saleem; Ingo Fetzer; Carsten F Dormann; Hauke Harms; Antonis Chatzinotas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Predator-prey chemical warfare determines the expression of biocontrol genes by rhizosphere-associated Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  Alexandre Jousset; Laurène Rochat; Stefan Scheu; Michael Bonkowski; Christoph Keel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  The role of Acanthamoeba spp. in biofilm communities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Larissa Fagundes Pinto; Brenda Nazaré Gomes Andriolo; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Denise Freitas
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Altered host cell-bacteria interaction due to nanoparticle interaction with a bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  Tara D Raftery; Heidi Lindler; Tamara L McNealy
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Identification of Functions Affecting Predator-Prey Interactions between Myxococcus xanthus and Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Susanne Müller; Sarah N Strack; Sarah E Ryan; Mary Shawgo; Abigail Walling; Susanna Harris; Chris Chambers; Jennifer Boddicker; John R Kirby
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Francisella novicida forms in vitro biofilms mediated by an orphan response regulator.

Authors:  Meghan W Durham-Colleran; Anne Brooks Verhoeven; Monique L van Hoek
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.