BACKGROUND: Products containing alcohol are commonly used with intravascular devices at insertion, to remove lipids from occluded intravascular devices used during parenteral nutrition, and increasingly for the prevention and treatment of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. The effects of alcohol on the integrity of intravascular devices remain unknown. METHODS: Two types of widely used commercial peripherally inserted central catheters, one made of polyetherurethane and one made of silicone, were exposed to a 70% ethanol lock solution for up to 10 weeks. Mechanical testing was performed to identify force-at-break, stress, strain, modulus of elasticity, modulus of toughness, and wall area of ethanol-exposed and control catheters. RESULTS: No significant differences between exposed and unexposed catheters were identified for any of the mechanical parameters tested except for a marginal reduction in the modulus of elasticity for both polyetherurethane and silicone catheters and minor increases in the wall area of polyetherurethane catheters. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that exposure to a 70% ethanol lock solution does not appreciably alter the integrity of selected commercial polyetherurethane and silicone catheters. Given the greatly expanded use of alcoholic solutions with intravascular devices of all types, we believe that manufacturers would be well advised to subject their catheters and other intravascular devices to formal testing of the type employed in this study.
BACKGROUND: Products containing alcohol are commonly used with intravascular devices at insertion, to remove lipids from occluded intravascular devices used during parenteral nutrition, and increasingly for the prevention and treatment of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. The effects of alcohol on the integrity of intravascular devices remain unknown. METHODS: Two types of widely used commercial peripherally inserted central catheters, one made of polyetherurethane and one made of silicone, were exposed to a 70% ethanol lock solution for up to 10 weeks. Mechanical testing was performed to identify force-at-break, stress, strain, modulus of elasticity, modulus of toughness, and wall area of ethanol-exposed and control catheters. RESULTS: No significant differences between exposed and unexposed catheters were identified for any of the mechanical parameters tested except for a marginal reduction in the modulus of elasticity for both polyetherurethane and silicone catheters and minor increases in the wall area of polyetherurethane catheters. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that exposure to a 70% ethanol lock solution does not appreciably alter the integrity of selected commercial polyetherurethane and silicone catheters. Given the greatly expanded use of alcoholic solutions with intravascular devices of all types, we believe that manufacturers would be well advised to subject their catheters and other intravascular devices to formal testing of the type employed in this study.
Authors: Mark L Kayton; Edward G Garmey; Nicole M Ishill; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Brian H Kushner; Kim Kramer; Shakeel Modak; Carol Rossetto; Courtney Hennelly; Melissa Parra Doyle; Shoshana Rosenberg; Olga Santoro; Michael P La Quaglia Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Leonard A Mermel; Michael Allon; Emilio Bouza; Donald E Craven; Patricia Flynn; Naomi P O'Grady; Issam I Raad; Bart J A Rijnders; Robert J Sherertz; David K Warren Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Daniel L Landry; Gregory L Braden; Stephen L Gobeille; Sarah D Haessler; Chirag K Vaidya; Stephen J Sweet Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: David W Kubiak; Erin T Gilmore; Mary W Buckley; Robert Lynch; Francisco M Marty; Sophia Koo Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Lennert Slobbe; Jeanette K Doorduijn; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Abdelilah El Barzouhi; Eric Boersma; Willem B van Leeuwen; Bart J A Rijnders Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Brian M Peters; Raven M Ward; Hallie S Rane; Samuel A Lee; Mairi C Noverr Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ethan A Mezoff; Lin Fei; Misty Troutt; Kim Klotz; Samuel A Kocoshis; Conrad R Cole Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Jennifer K Broom; Stacey O'Shea; Sridevi Govindarajulu; E Geoffrey Playford; Carmel M Hawley; Nicole M Isbel; Scott B Campbell; David W Mudge; Sally Carpenter; Barbara C Johnson; Neil P Underwood; David W Johnson Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 2.388