Literature DB >> 1615622

A survey of ovine parasite control practices in Tennessee.

C R Reinemeyer1, B W Rohrbach, V M Grant, G L Radde.   

Abstract

A sample of 126 sheep producers in Tennessee was randomly selected from the members of a statewide organization of sheep producers. Data about the participants' farms, sheep, parasite control practices and sources of information regarding ovine parasite control were obtained by a telephone survey. The response rate was 99%. The typical respondent kept 20 lambs, 20 ewes and 2 rams on three pastures totalling 20 acres. In order of decreasing frequency, anthelmintics were given according to a regular schedule, to coincide with breeding management procedures, or to treat clinical signs of parasitism. Proportions of producers deworming the various classes of sheep zero, one, two, three, four or more than four times annually were as follows: lambs--3, 28, 40, 16, 9 and 8%, respectively; ewes--3, 8, 20, 16, 34 and 22%, respectively; rams--1, 9, 19, 15, 38 and 19%, respectively. The majority of respondents planned to deworm lambs (89%) and ewes (82%) the same number of times in the following year. Of the producers who dewormed sheep two or more times during 1989, 39-49% (ranges include different proportions for lambs, ewes and rams) used the same anthelmintic exclusively, and 51-61% used two or more drug classes. Of the owners using a single anthelmintic exclusively, most (39-66%) used ivermectin, followed by levamisole (19-33%) and benzimidazoles (13-24%). One hundred and three of 124 (83%) producers intended to use the same anthelmintics in the future. Sixty-four of 124 (52%) producers had discontinued using at least one ovine anthelmintic. The most common reasons for discontinuance were dissatisfaction with the clinical response after treatment and inconvenience of administration. Sheep-oriented publications, other sheep producers and veterinarians were considered the most important sources of information about deworming programs and choice of anthelmintics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1615622     DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90107-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  4 in total

Review 1.  Drug resistance in human helminths: current situation and lessons from livestock.

Authors:  S Geerts; B Gryseels
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  A validated high-throughput method for assaying rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) motility when challenged with potentially anthelmintic natural products from Hawaiian fungi.

Authors:  Randi L Rollins; Mallique Qader; William L Gosnell; Cong Wang; Shugeng Cao; Robert H Cowie
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 3.  Is anthelmintic resistance a concern for the control of human soil-transmitted helminths?

Authors:  Jozef Vercruysse; Marco Albonico; Jerzy M Behnke; Andrew C Kotze; Roger K Prichard; James S McCarthy; Antonio Montresor; Bruno Levecke
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Anthelmintics Resistance; How to Overcome it?

Authors:  Hatem A Shalaby
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.012

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.