Literature DB >> 16156213

Effects of qualitative feed restriction during rearing on the performance of broiler breeders during rearing and lay.

B J Tolkamp1, V Sandilands, I Kyriazakis.   

Abstract

To prevent health and fertility problems associated with excessive weight gain, broiler breeders are severely feed restricted during rearing, which may affect welfare. We compared the effects of an experimental ad libitum feeding regimen based on qualitative restriction of food intake with conventional quantitative food restriction on the performance of female broiler breeders during rearing and lay. During rearing up to 20 wk of age, control birds were fed restricted amounts of standard broiler breeder mash once daily. Experimental birds had ad libitum access to the same standard mash mixed with 400 g of oat hulls/kg of feed and increasing concentrations of Ca propionate, an appetite suppressant. Mean total mash intake during rearing was 8.12 kg and did not differ between treatments. Both control and experimental birds showed an almost linear growth curve, treatment mean body weights were always within 100 g of the target weight line, and treatments did not differ for body weight uniformity. Groups were subjected to the same quantitative feed restriction from during lay. Feeding regimen during rearing did not affect number of eggs produced, egg weight, or egg quality up to 46 wk of age. We concluded that it may not be necessary to subject chicks to severe quantitative feed restriction to achieve desirable growth curves and body weight uniformity during rearing. Qualitative restriction of feed intake can achieve desirable growth curves in ad libitum fed chicks during rearing, and such a feeding regimen does not have negative effects on hen performance during lay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156213     DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.8.1286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Effects of early feed restriction on live performance, carcass characteristics, meat and liver composition, some blood parameters, heterophil-lymphocyte ratio, antibody production and tonic immobility duration.

Authors:  E E Onbaşilar; S Yalçin; E Torlak; P Ozdemir
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Effect of quantitative feed restriction on broiler performance.

Authors:  T L Khetani; T T Nkukwana; M Chimonyo; V Muchenje
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  The melanocortin circuit in obese and lean strains of chicks.

Authors:  Gideon Hen; Sara Yosefi; Victoria Simchaev; Dmitry Shinder; Victor J Hruby; Miriam Friedman-Einat
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Sex differences in basal hypothalamic anorectic and orexigenic gene expression and the effect of quantitative and qualitative food restriction.

Authors:  S D Caughey; P W Wilson; N Mukhtar; S Brocklehurst; A Reid; R B D'Eath; T Boswell; I C Dunn
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.027

5.  Propionate inhibits fat deposition via affecting feed intake and modulating gut microbiota in broilers.

Authors:  Haifang Li; Liqin Zhao; Shuang Liu; Zhihao Zhang; Xiaojuan Wang; Hai Lin
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Effect of early photostimulation at 15-weeks of age and everyday spin feeding on broiler breeder performance.

Authors:  A P Benson; R H Blocher; Z R Jarrell; C K Meeks; M B Habersang; J L Wilson; A J Davis
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  A feed restriction milieu for Pekin meat ducks that may improve gait characteristics but also affects gut leakiness.

Authors:  A Bentley; L Porter; L Van Blois; B Van Wyk; C N Vuong; G Tellez-Isaias; D Shafer; Z Tucker; S M Fraley; B M Hargis; G S Fraley
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.