Literature DB >> 16156206

Performance of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with a direct-fed microbial.

R Angel1, R A Dalloul, J Doerr.   

Abstract

From hatch to 18 d of age broilers were fed starter diets with (0.9 kg/ton) or without direct fed microbial (DFM). At 18 d, birds were weighed and, within DFM treatment (trt), randomly assigned to battery pens. In Exp 1, a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of nutrient density [control (C, 19.3% protein (CP), 0.84%, Ca 0.37% nonphytin P (nPP); and 17.1% CP, 0.8% Ca, and 0.3% nPP in the grower (Gr) and finisher (Fn) diets, respectively) and moderate (M) (17% CP, 0.69% Ca, 0.30% nPP; 15% CP, 0.66% Ca, 0.25% nPP in the Gr and Fn diets, respectively)] and DFM concentration [0 or 0.9 kg/ton (++)] was used. Exp 2 was a 2 (DSM at 0 and 0.45 kg/ton) x 3 (nutrient densities) factorial. Exp 2 included a low (L) nutrient density that differed from diet M only in Ca and nPP concentrations and an added trt, diet M with 0.45 kg/ ton DFM as in Exp 1. At the end of the Gr and Fn weight, feed efficiency, apparent nutrient retention were determined, and 4 birds per pen were sampled for tibia ash. In Exp 2, gains in the Gr phase were 1,122.0, 983.7, 1,121.5, 930.7, and 1,151.5 g in birds fed the C, M, M+, L, and L+ diets, respectively. Addition of DFM to the M diet overcame the negative effect of nutrient concentration on performance but not when the L diet was fed. Nutrient level and DFM affected apparent protein, Ca, and P retention at 32 or 42 d of age with retention increasing as nutrient level decreased and with DFM added to the diet. Ca and P retention at 28 d (Exp 1) was higher in birds fed M++ (45.8 and 46%, respectively) than in those fed the C diet (38.7 and 40.0%, respectively). Feeding the M and L diets resulted in lower tibia ash than that of birds fed the C diet, but the addition of DFM to low nutrient diets overcame this negative effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156206     DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.8.1222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Oral treatment of chickens with lactobacilli influences elicitation of immune responses.

Authors:  Jennifer T Brisbin; Joshua Gong; Shahriar Orouji; Jessica Esufali; Amirul I Mallick; Payvand Parvizi; Patricia E Shewen; Shayan Sharif
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-07-06

2.  Oral administration of Lactobacillus reuteri expressing a 3D8 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) enhances chicken growth and conserves immune homeostasis.

Authors:  Shanmugam Sureshkumar; Sun Keun Jung; Dongjun Kim; Keon Bong Oh; Hyeon Yang; Hwi Cheul Lee; Jo Yong Jin; Lee Hae Sun; Sukchan Lee; Sung June Byun
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Effects of probiotic lactic acid bacteria on growth performance, carcass characteristics, hematological indices, humoral immunity, and IGF-I gene expression in broiler chicken.

Authors:  Mandana Salehizadeh; Mohammad Hossein Modarressi; Seyed Naser Mousavi; Maryam Tajabadi Ebrahimi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.893

4.  Effect of different supplements on eggshell quality, some characteristics of gastrointestinal tract and performance of laying hens.

Authors:  Mosayeb Shalaei; Seyed Mohammad Hosseini; Emel Zergani
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.054

5.  Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei L1 and Its Growth Performance-Promotion in Chicken by Improving the Intestinal Microflora.

Authors:  Yunhe Xu; Yuan Tian; Yunfang Cao; Jianguo Li; Haonan Guo; Yuhong Su; Yumin Tian; Cheng Wang; Tianqi Wang; Lili Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Effects of Yeast (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) Probiotics Supplementation on Bone Quality Characteristics in Young Japanese Quail (Coturnix Japonica): The Role of Sex on the Action of the Gut-Bone Axis.

Authors:  Siemowit Muszyński; Piotr Dobrowolski; Kornel Kasperek; Sebastian Knaga; Małgorzata Kwiecień; Janine Donaldson; Mateusz Kutyła; Małgorzata Kapica; Ewa Tomaszewska
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Evaluating Alternatives to Zinc-Bacitracin Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Broilers: Physiological and Meat Quality Responses.

Authors:  Kwena Thema; Victor Mlambo; Natasha Snyman; Caven Mguvane Mnisi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.