BACKGROUND: Quality improvement processes have sometimes met with limited success in small, independent primary care settings. The theoretical framework for these processes uses an implied understanding of organizations as predictable with potentially controllable components. However, most organizations are not accurately described using this framework. Complexity science provides a better fit for understanding small primary care practices. METHODS: The Multimethod Assessment Process (MAP)/Reflective Adaptive Process (RAP) is informed by complexity science. This process was developed in a series of studies designed to understand and improve primary care practice. A case example illustrates the application and impact of the MAP/RAP process. RESULTS: Guiding principles for a reflective change process include the following: an understanding of practices' vision and mission is useful in guiding change, learning and reflection helps organizations adapt to and plan change, tension and discomfort are essential and normal during change, and diverse perspectives foster adaptability and new insights for positive change. DISCUSSION: A reflective change process that treats organizations as complex adaptive systems may help practices make sustainable improvements.
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement processes have sometimes met with limited success in small, independent primary care settings. The theoretical framework for these processes uses an implied understanding of organizations as predictable with potentially controllable components. However, most organizations are not accurately described using this framework. Complexity science provides a better fit for understanding small primary care practices. METHODS: The Multimethod Assessment Process (MAP)/Reflective Adaptive Process (RAP) is informed by complexity science. This process was developed in a series of studies designed to understand and improve primary care practice. A case example illustrates the application and impact of the MAP/RAP process. RESULTS: Guiding principles for a reflective change process include the following: an understanding of practices' vision and mission is useful in guiding change, learning and reflection helps organizations adapt to and plan change, tension and discomfort are essential and normal during change, and diverse perspectives foster adaptability and new insights for positive change. DISCUSSION: A reflective change process that treats organizations as complex adaptive systems may help practices make sustainable improvements.
Authors: Malaz A Boustani; Greg A Sachs; Catherine A Alder; Stephanie Munger; Cathy C Schubert; Mary Guerriero Austrom; Ann M Hake; Frederick W Unverzagt; Martin Farlow; Brandy R Matthews; Anthony J Perkins; Robin A Beck; Christopher M Callahan Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Eric K Shaw; Sabrina M Chase; Jenna Howard; Paul A Nutting; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Nels Marcus Thygeson; Leif I Solberg; Stephen E Asche; Patricia Fontaine; Leonard Gregory Pawlson; Sarah Hudson Scholle Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Bijal A Balasubramanian; Sabrina M Chase; Paul A Nutting; Deborah J Cohen; Pamela A Ohman Strickland; Jesse C Crosson; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange; Carlos Roberto Jaén Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Kurt C Stange; Elizabeth E Stewart; Carlos Roberto Jaén Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Holly Jordan Lanham; Raymond F Palmer; Luci K Leykum; Reuben R McDaniel; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange; Benjamin F Crabtree; William L Miller; Carlos Roberto Jaén Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Christopher M Callahan; Tatiana Foroud; Andrew J Saykin; Anantha Shekhar; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: Transl Res Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 7.012
Authors: Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Shawna V Hudson; Eric K Shaw; Jesse C Crosson; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.254