Literature DB >> 16156178

Wishful thinking and source monitoring.

Ruthanna Gordon1, Nancy Franklin, Jennifer Beck.   

Abstract

Memory distortions sometimes serve a purpose: It may be in our interest to misremember some details of an event or to forget others altogether. The present work examines whether a similar phenomenon occurs for source attribution. Given that the source of a memory provides information about the accuracy of its content, people may be biased toward source attributions that are consistent with desired accuracy. In Experiment 1, participants read desirable and undesirable predictions made by sources differing in their a priori reliability and showed a wishful thinking bias--that is, a bias to attribute desirable predictions to the reliable source and undesirable predictions to the unreliable source. Experiment 2 showed that this wishful thinking effect depends on retrieval processes. Experiment 3 showed that under some circumstances, wishes concerning one event can produce systematic source memory errors for others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156178     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions.

Authors:  Gabriel I Cook; Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2003-06

Review 2.  The case for motivated reasoning.

Authors:  Z Kunda
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Reading and visual memory: remembering scenes that were never seen.

Authors:  H Intraub; J E Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1992

4.  Remembering chosen and assigned options.

Authors:  Mara Mather; Eldar Shafir; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

5.  The sampling distribution of d'.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

6.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.

Authors:  T B Rogers; N A Kuiper; W S Kirker
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1977-09

Review 7.  The illusion of reality: a review and integration of psychological research on hallucinations.

Authors:  R P Bentall
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.

Authors:  M K Johnson; M A Foley; A G Suengas; C L Raye
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

Review 9.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Choice-supportive source monitoring: do our decisions seem better to us as we age?

Authors:  M Mather; M K Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Source misattributions may increase the accuracy of source judgments.

Authors:  Keith B Lyle; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

2.  Self-relevance and wishful thinking: facilitation and distortion in source monitoring.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Ruthanna Gordon; Nancy Franklin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

Review 3.  Source monitoring 15 years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?

Authors:  Karen J Mitchell; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Source credibility and syllogistic reasoning.

Authors:  David E Copeland; Kris Gunawan; Nicole J Bies-Hernandez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

5.  Motivated misremembering of selfish decisions.

Authors:  Ryan W Carlson; Michel André Maréchal; Bastiaan Oud; Ernst Fehr; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.