PURPOSE: This study was conducted to develop a new positron emission tomography (PET) method to visualize neurokinin-1 (NK(1)) receptor systems in the human brain in vivo in order to examine their neuroanatomical distribution and facilitate investigations of the role of substance P, NK(1) receptors, and NK(1) receptor antagonists in central nervous system (CNS) function and dysfunction. METHODS: PET studies were conducted in 10 healthy male volunteers using a novel selective, high-affinity NK(1) receptor antagonist labeled with fluorine-18 to very high specific radioactivity (up to 2000 GBq/micromol) [F-18]SPA-RQ. Data were collected in 3D mode for greatest sensitivity. Different modeling methods were compared and regional receptor distributions determined for comparison with in vitro autoradiographic studies using postmortem human brain slices with [F-18]SPA-RQ. RESULTS: The studies showed that the highest uptake of [F-18]SPA-RQ was observed in the caudate and putamen. Lower binding was found in globus pallidus and substantia nigra. [F-18]SPA-RQ uptake was also widespread throughout the neocortex and limbic cortex including amygdala and hippocampus. There was very low specific uptake of the tracer in the cerebellar cortex. The distribution pattern was confirmed using in vitro receptor autoradiography with [F-18]SPA-RQ on postmortem human brain slices. Kinetic modeling of the [F-18]SPA-RQ uptake data indicated a binding potential between 4 and 5 in the basal ganglia and between 1.5 and 2.5 in the cortical regions. CONCLUSIONS: [F-18]SPA-RQ is a novel tool for exploration of the functions of NK(1) receptors in man. [F-18]SPA-RQ can be used to define receptor pharmacodynamics and focus dose selection of novel NK(1) receptor antagonists in clinical trials thereby ensuring adequate proof of concept testing particularly in therapeutic applications related to CNS dysfunction.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to develop a new positron emission tomography (PET) method to visualize neurokinin-1 (NK(1)) receptor systems in the human brain in vivo in order to examine their neuroanatomical distribution and facilitate investigations of the role of substance P, NK(1) receptors, and NK(1) receptor antagonists in central nervous system (CNS) function and dysfunction. METHODS: PET studies were conducted in 10 healthy male volunteers using a novel selective, high-affinity NK(1) receptor antagonist labeled with fluorine-18 to very high specific radioactivity (up to 2000 GBq/micromol) [F-18]SPA-RQ. Data were collected in 3D mode for greatest sensitivity. Different modeling methods were compared and regional receptor distributions determined for comparison with in vitro autoradiographic studies using postmortem human brain slices with [F-18]SPA-RQ. RESULTS: The studies showed that the highest uptake of [F-18]SPA-RQ was observed in the caudate and putamen. Lower binding was found in globus pallidus and substantia nigra. [F-18]SPA-RQ uptake was also widespread throughout the neocortex and limbic cortex including amygdala and hippocampus. There was very low specific uptake of the tracer in the cerebellar cortex. The distribution pattern was confirmed using in vitro receptor autoradiography with [F-18]SPA-RQ on postmortem human brain slices. Kinetic modeling of the [F-18]SPA-RQ uptake data indicated a binding potential between 4 and 5 in the basal ganglia and between 1.5 and 2.5 in the cortical regions. CONCLUSIONS: [F-18]SPA-RQ is a novel tool for exploration of the functions of NK(1) receptors in man. [F-18]SPA-RQ can be used to define receptor pharmacodynamics and focus dose selection of novel NK(1) receptor antagonists in clinical trials thereby ensuring adequate proof of concept testing particularly in therapeutic applications related to CNS dysfunction.
Authors: Olof Solin; Olli Eskola; Terence G Hamill; Jörgen Bergman; Pertti Lehikoinen; Tove Grönroos; Sarita Forsback; Merja Haaparanta; Tapio Viljanen; Christine Ryan; Raymond Gibson; Gerard Kieczykowski; Jarmo Hietala; Richard Hargreaves; H Donald Burns Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: K A Maubach; K Martin; G Chicchi; T Harrison; A Wheeldon; C J Swain; M J Cumberbatch; N M J Rupniak; G R Seabrook Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2002 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: F D Tattersall; W Rycroft; M Cumberbatch; G Mason; S Tye; D J Williamson; J J Hale; S G Mills; P E Finke; M MacCoss; S Sadowski; E Ber; M Cascieri; R G Hill; D E MacIntyre; R J Hargreaves Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2000-02-14 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: J Hietala; E Syvälahti; K Vuorio; V Räkköläinen; J Bergman; M Haaparanta; O Solin; M Kuoppamäki; O Kirvelä; U Ruotsalainen Journal: Lancet Date: 1995-10-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mark S Kramer; Andrew Winokur; Jeffrey Kelsey; Sheldon H Preskorn; Anthony J Rothschild; Duane Snavely; Kalyan Ghosh; William A Ball; Scott A Reines; Dennis Munjack; Jeffrey T Apter; Lynn Cunningham; Mitchel Kling; Mohammed Bari; Albert Getson; Yih Lee Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Fumihiko Yasuno; Sandra M Sanabria; Donald Burns; Richard J Hargreaves; Subroto Ghose; Masanori Ichise; Frederick T Chin; Cheryl L Morse; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis Journal: Synapse Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Sanjay J Mathew; Meena Vythilingam; James W Murrough; Carlos A Zarate; Adriana Feder; David A Luckenbaugh; Becky Kinkead; Michael K Parides; David G Trist; Massimo S Bani; Paolo U Bettica; Emiliangelo M Ratti; Dennis S Charney Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Jaymin Upadhyay; Julie Anderson; Adam J Schwarz; Alexandre Coimbra; Richard Baumgartner; G Pendse; Edward George; Lauren Nutile; Diana Wallin; James Bishop; Saujanya Neni; Gary Maier; Smriti Iyengar; Jeffery L Evelhoch; David Bleakman; Richard Hargreaves; Lino Becerra; David Borsook Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Johanna M Jarcho; Natasha A Feier; Alberto Bert; Jennifer A Labus; Maunoo Lee; Jean Stains; Bahar Ebrat; Stephanie M Groman; Kirsten Tillisch; Arthur L Brody; Edythe D London; Mark A Mandelkern; Emeran A Mayer Journal: Pain Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: A Frick; F Åhs; Å M Palmquist; A Pissiota; U Wallenquist; M Fernandez; M Jonasson; L Appel; Ö Frans; M Lubberink; T Furmark; L von Knorring; M Fredrikson Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Yota Fujimura; Fumihiko Yasuno; Amanda Farris; Jeih-San Liow; Marilla Geraci; Wayne Drevets; Daniel S Pine; Subroto Ghose; Alicja Lerner; Richard Hargreaves; H Donald Burns; Cheryl Morse; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-02-07 Impact factor: 13.382