Literature DB >> 16155473

Economic burden of illness for employees with painful conditions.

Alan G White1, Howard G Birnbaum, Milena N Mareva, Aaron E Henckler, Patricia Grossman, David A Mallett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the medical services utilization and average annual direct (ie, medical and medication) and indirect (ie, work-loss) costs for employees with painful conditions to a random sample ("average employee").
METHODS: An employer administrative claims database (approximately 600,000 insured lives) was used to identify patients with ICD-9 codes for painful conditions. Direct costs were total employer medical and medication costs and indirect costs were associated with medically related absenteeism days and disability claims.
RESULTS: Among employees with painful conditions, total costs were 1.5 to 3.5 times as high (P < 0.01) as those of the average employee (ie, 7088 US dollars to 16,874 US dollars compared with 4,849 US dollars) depending on the painful condition.
CONCLUSIONS: Painful conditions are costly to employers, and better management/treatment of such conditions may help reduce the associated employer economic burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16155473     DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000172867.29041.eb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cost-of-illness studies : a review of current methods.

Authors:  Ebere Akobundu; Jing Ju; Lisa Blatt; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Predisposing effects of neonatal visceral pain on abuse-related effects of morphine in adult male Sprague Dawley rats.

Authors:  Andrew P Norwood; Elie D Al-Chaer; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Interstitial Cystitis: Cost, treatment and co-morbidities in an employed population.

Authors:  Eric Q Wu; Howard Birnbaum; Milena Mareva; Andrew Parece; Zihong Huang; David Mallett; Haya Taitel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  [Ethic charter of the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS)].

Authors:  S Reiter-Theil; T Graf-Baumann; K Kutzer; H C Müller-Busch; R Stutzki; H C Traue; A Willweber-Strumpf; M Zimmermann; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Epidemiology of regular prescribed opioid use: results from a national, population-based survey.

Authors:  Teresa J Hudson; Mark J Edlund; Diane E Steffick; Shanti P Tripathi; Mark D Sullivan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  The importance of job characteristics in determining medical care-seeking in the Dutch working population, a longitudinal survey study.

Authors:  Romy Steenbeek
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Interference with work in fibromyalgia: effect of treatment with pregabalin and relation to pain response.

Authors:  Sebastian Straube; R Andrew Moore; Jocelyn Paine; Sheena Derry; Ceri J Phillips; Ernst Hallier; Henry J McQuay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians.

Authors:  Libby Holden; Paul A Scuffham; Michael F Hilton; Robert S Ware; Nerina Vecchio; Harvey A Whiteford
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.