Literature DB >> 16155216

Female receptivity in butterflies and moths.

Nina Wedell1.   

Abstract

Female receptivity in butterflies and moths is influenced by a multitude of factors that vary between virgin and mated females, and is often affected by the quality and persistence of courting males. Mated females of polyandrous species frequently display a period of non-receptivity following mating, often resulting from factors transferred by the male at mating. Some of these compounds have a transient effect (e.g. anti-aphrodisiacs and mating plugs), whereas others induce long-term suppression of receptivity (i.e. sperm and seminal factors). Sperm appear to generally induce long-term suppression of female receptivity in both butterflies and moths. In some species, production of non-fertile sperm may function to fill the female's sperm storage organ and switch off receptivity, although whether this is a general phenomenon across the Lepidoptera has not yet been examined. Examination of seminal fluids suppressing female receptivity in moths suggests that more than one factor is implicated, but frequently the transfer or stimulation of Juvenile Hormone production is involved. Surprisingly, potential seminal factors influencing female receptivity in butterflies remain largely unexplored. In this review, I summarize the various factors that are known to affect female receptivity in the Lepidoptera to date, and briefly compare the function and similarity of the Pheromone Suppressing Peptide (HezPSP) in moths to that of the Sex Peptide in Drosophila melanogaster (DrmSP). The exciting possibility that seminal peptides in the Lepidoptera and Diptera (e.g. Drosophila melanogaster) may have shared functionality is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16155216     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  26 in total

Review 1.  Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm?

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell; T Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A contact anti-aphrodisiac pheromone supplied by the spermatophore in the rove beetle Aleochara curtula: mode of transfer and evolutionary significance.

Authors:  Jerry Schlechter-Helas; Thomas Schmitt; Klaus Peschke
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-08-26

3.  Sperm-depleted males influence the reproductive behaviour of conspecifics.

Authors:  Philippe Louâpre; Stéphanie Llopis; Véronique Martel; Joan van Baaren
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-09-03

4.  Sperm morph and remating frequency in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.

Authors:  Doko-Miles J Thorburn; Robert J Knell; Jonathan M Parrett
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Seminal fluid and accessory male investment in sperm competition.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Effects of mating on host selection by female small white butterflies Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).

Authors:  Yuki Itoh; Yukiko Okumura; Takeshi Fujii; Yukio Ishikawa; Hisashi Ômura
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Age Influence on Sexual Behavior of the Lesser Cornstalk Borer, Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Authors:  L M S Xavier; D M Magalhães; P A Viana; M C Blassioli-Moraes; M Borges; J A F Barrigossi; E F Vilela; R A Laumann
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.434

8.  An antiaphrodisiac in Heliconius melpomene butterflies.

Authors:  Stefan Schulz; Catalina Estrada; Selma Yildizhan; Michael Boppré; Lawrence E Gilbert
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  The evolution of a female genital trait widely distributed in the Lepidoptera: comparative evidence for an effect of sexual coevolution.

Authors:  Víctor Sánchez; Blanca Estela Hernández-Baños; Carlos Cordero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nuptial gifts fail to resolve a sexual conflict in an insect.

Authors:  Nina Wedell; Tom Tregenza; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.