Literature DB >> 16154740

A protein canyon in the FGF-FGF receptor dimer selects from an à la carte menu of heparan sulfate motifs.

Moosa Mohammadi1, Shaun K Olsen, Regina Goetz.   

Abstract

Heparan sulfate (HS) is an essential and dynamic regulator of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling. Two fundamentally different crystallographic models have been proposed to explain, at the molecular level, how HS/heparin enables FGF and FGF receptor (FGFR) to assemble into a functional dimer on the cell surface. In the symmetric 'two-end' model, the heparin-binding sites of FGF and FGFR merge to form a basic canyon that recruits two HS for binding. Within this canyon, the HS molecules primarily act to orchestrate and fortify multivalent and cooperative protein-protein contacts within the dimer that are the foundations of dimerization. In contrast, in the asymmetric model, which mechanistically resembles the previously proposed trans FGF dimer model, a single heparin molecule facilitates dimerization by cross-linking two FGFs into a trans dimer that brings together the two FGFRs. Interestingly, the crystal structure upon which the asymmetric model is based contains a symmetric dimer reminiscent of the symmetric two-end model, suggesting that a different interpretation of the crystal structure has led to the postulation of the asymmetric model. Importantly, the symmetric two-end model provides an intriguing solution to the problem of how HS selectivity is achieved in FGF signaling. The model reveals that, within the canyon, FGF and FGFR no longer adhere to their individual HS binding specificities, but instead act in unison to search for a unique HS motif from a plethora of HS epitopes that are expressed in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated fashion. Primary sequence differences within the heparin-binding sites of FGFs and FGFRs, together with ligand-induced changes in FGFR conformation, lead to the formation of distinct canyons with unique HS specificity for individual FGF-FGFR complexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16154740     DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  57 in total

1.  Specific interaction of the envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2 with liver heparan sulfate involved in the tissue tropismatic infection by hepatitis C virus.

Authors:  Fumi Kobayashi; Shuhei Yamada; Shuhei Taguwa; Chikako Kataoka; Satomi Naito; Yoshiki Hama; Hideki Tani; Yoshiharu Matsuura; Kazuyuki Sugahara
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 2.916

2.  Conversion of a paracrine fibroblast growth factor into an endocrine fibroblast growth factor.

Authors:  Regina Goetz; Mutsuko Ohnishi; Serkan Kir; Hiroshi Kurosu; Lei Wang; Johanne Pastor; Jinghong Ma; Weiming Gai; Makoto Kuro-o; Mohammed S Razzaque; Moosa Mohammadi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Unliganded fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 forms density-independent dimers.

Authors:  Laëtitia Comps-Agrar; Diana Ronai Dunshee; Dan L Eaton; Junichiro Sonoda
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Fibroblast growth factor 2 dimer with superagonist in vitro activity improves granulation tissue formation during wound healing.

Authors:  Caitlin G Decker; Yu Wang; Samantha J Paluck; Lu Shen; Joseph A Loo; Alex J Levine; Lloyd S Miller; Heather D Maynard
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. The complete mammalian FGF family.

Authors:  Xiuqin Zhang; Omar A Ibrahimi; Shaun K Olsen; Hisashi Umemori; Moosa Mohammadi; David M Ornitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Neuroactive chondroitin sulfate glycomimetics.

Authors:  Manish Rawat; Cristal I Gama; John B Matson; Linda C Hsieh-Wilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  FGFR4 and its novel splice form in myogenic cells: Interplay of glycosylation and tyrosine phosphorylation.

Authors:  Boguslaw A Kwiatkowski; Irina Kirillova; Robert E Richard; David Israeli; Zipora Yablonka-Reuveni
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Differential interactions of FGFs with heparan sulfate control gradient formation and branching morphogenesis.

Authors:  Helen P Makarenkova; Matthew P Hoffman; Andrew Beenken; Anna V Eliseenkova; Robyn Meech; Cindy Tsau; Vaishali N Patel; Richard A Lang; Moosa Mohammadi
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 8.192

9.  Homodimerization controls the fibroblast growth factor 9 subfamily's receptor binding and heparan sulfate-dependent diffusion in the extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Juliya Kalinina; Sara A Byron; Helen P Makarenkova; Shaun K Olsen; Anna V Eliseenkova; William J Larochelle; Mohanraj Dhanabal; Steven Blais; David M Ornitz; Loren A Day; Thomas A Neubert; Pamela M Pollock; Moosa Mohammadi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Increased protein stability of FGF1 can compensate for its reduced affinity for heparin.

Authors:  Malgorzata Zakrzewska; Antoni Wiedlocha; Anna Szlachcic; Daniel Krowarsch; Jacek Otlewski; Sjur Olsnes
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.